Request for Articles for the October ADR Quarterly
The ADR Quarterly is looking for articles on ADR subjects. This is your chance to become a published author. You are invited to send a Word copy of your proposed article to Lee Hornberger at email@example.com.
The deadline for the October 2014 ADR Quarterly is August 15, 2014.
Mediating Bullying and Harassment Disputes in the School Setting Teleseminar
Date: August 27, 2014
Time: Noon-1:30 p.m.
Register: online or by mail/fax form PDF
Call-in information and a link to written materials for this program will be provided on your seminar confirmation.
The Alternative Dispute Resolution Section of the State Bar of Michigan is pleased to announce the next installment in its Lunch & Learn series: a 90-minute teleseminar on “Bullying and Harassment Disputes in the
Student harassment based on race, gender, disability and national origin is a pervasive problem in Michigan schools. Learn about the impact of bullying, relevant state and federal law and proactive and effective approaches to resolving peer-to-peer harassment.
The presenters: Join one of the most innovative and respected mediators in school-related disputes, Attorney/Mediator Laura Athens. Ms. Athens will be interviewed by nationally known facilitator and trainer, Zena Zumeta. Robert E. L. Wright will moderate the program.
Save the Date
2014 Section Annual Meeting, Training, Dinner, & Awards
October 17-18, 2014
Kensington Court Hotel, Ann Arbor
A brief business meeting will be followed by 8 hours of exciting advanced mediator training featuring nationally renowned mediator, attorney, conflict coach, trainer, and facilitator Cheryl Cutrona.
There is no fee to attend the business meeting.
Let Litigants Know that MEDIATION Really Works!
Mediation Settles Cases
- Nearly 70% of all cases sent to mediation result in settlements that day. Compare to 17% acceptance rates for case evaluation. Many cases which don't settle on the day of mediation, do so shortly afterwards.
- Nearly all mediated agreements are fulfilled by the parties. A 1999 SCAO study showed a voluntary compliance rate of 90% for mediated agreements vs. 53% for non-mediated judgments.
- Client surveys show that over 90% of mediation participants are satisfied with mediation even if the case is not resolved at mediation.
Mediation Procedures Are Flexible
- Location for the mediation is flexible: attorney offices, courthouses, conference rooms, hotels, airports, even homes!
- Timing is flexible to accommodate discovery needs.
- Relief is flexible and not limited to remedies available in court.
- Although most are concluded in a single session, multiple mediation sessions are possible and can be scheduled at the convenience of the participants.
- Parties can jointly select a mediator or, absent agreement, the ADR Clerk can appoint one randomly from the court's roster of qualified mediators.
Mediation is Often Effective When Used Early
- Although scheduling the actual mediation session(s) should be jointly determined between the mediator and all counsel, mediation often works best when scheduled before positions harden and parties become entrenched.
- Extensive and costly formal discovery is not always necessary prior to mediation—mediators can help counsel narrow and target discovery to obtain the essential information required for mediation.
- In fact, early mediation is likely to save time and money otherwise invested in discovery.
Mediation Saves Time & Money
- Because mediation more often than not either leads to a settlement or narrows discovery, it saves both time and money.
- Early mediation often maximizes the savings to all parties. The mediator can help tailor the process to maximize savings while accommodating discovery needs.
- While parties usually pay a pro rata share of the mediator's charges, studies show they will still save money.
Mediation Allows the Parties to Obtain Their Own Best Resolution
- The parties themselves are best able to devise a settlement to meet their fundamental needs, which may include relief not available in court.
- Mediation is "party-centric," providing the only point in litigation with direct communication between the parties and informal communication directly with opposing lawyers.
- A mediated settlement may include issues and persons outside the confines of litigation.
Mediation Helps All Participants Assess Risks
- Cases often don't settle prior to trial due to limited views or positions taken by one or more parties or counsel. In mediation, such views or positions are often changed and the parties are able to proceed with a more realistic assessment of their case.
- Clients and their counsel need to confront the strengths of their opponent's case as well as the weaknesses of their own case, prior to the day of trial. Mediation can assist parties to identify such strengths and weaknesses, and quantify the cost of a trial, to permit them to engage in more meaningful risk assessment. Often, attorneys appreciate having their OWN clients receive this reality testing from a neutral observer.
Mediation Does Not Require Parties to Settle
- Parties ordered into mediation are not forced to settle. They are never compelled to accept a proposal with which they disagree. They are merely expected to discuss the case directly with their opponents.
- Even when complete resolution is not achieved, mediation may still help to resolve some of the issues and help everyone focus on the important ones.
- Working with a mediator allows attorneys and clients to control their destiny by fashioning their own resolution rather than having others do so.
- Mediation can preserve or restore relationships by eliminating fundamental misunderstandings and by improving communication between parties.