Administrative Rules for
PART 201 ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION
of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act 1994 PA 451, as
amended
Rule 534.
(1) A remedial action plan (RAP) shall address all environmental contamination
at a facility unless the RAP precisely describes the contamination to be
excluded and is accompanied by an affidavit from the person submitting the RAP
stating that he or she is not liable for 1 or more unremediated releases at the
facility identified in the RAP and that he or she can demonstrate divisibility
of harm and apportionment of liability as required by section 20129 of the act
for the unremediated releases. For
purposes of this rule, "unremediated release" means a release for which
response activity has not been implemented that satisfies the remedial action
requirements of part 201 of the act and these rules.
(2)
The affidavit described in subrule (1) of this rule shall contain, or provide as an
attachment, information that explains and supports the basis for the conclusion
that the person submitting the RAP is not liable for the contamination proposed
to be omitted from the RAP. The
affidavit or attachment shall also fully document the demonstration of
divisibility of harm and apportionment of liability under section 20129 of the
act. If the affidavit described in this
subrule is provided, then the RAP may omit actions to address the unremediated
releases.
(3)
If the department approves a RAP that excludes unremediated
releases, relying on representations about liability that are set forth in the
affidavit of the person seeking approval, the ability of the department to
subsequently review the liability of the person seeking approval of the RAP is
not limited or affected by reliance on the affidavit or approval of the RAP. Upon review of the affidavit, supporting
materials, and other information available to the department at any time, the
department may determine that there is reason to believe that the person submitting
a RAP is liable for the contamination proposed to be omitted from the RAP or
that he or she has not met the burden of demonstrating divisibility of harm and
apportionment of liability under section 20129 of the act.
(4) A person who implements a RAP that does not address
the entire facility after following the procedure set forth in this rule, but
who is later found to be liable, or to have failed to establish divisibility of
harm or apportionment of liability shall promptly undertake remedial action to
address that portion of the facility not covered by the RAP.
(5) If a person who is liable undertakes a remedial
action that he or she knows will not, when complete, comprehensively address
all contamination at a facility at the time the remedial action is undertaken,
except as provided in this rule for unremediated releases, then the person is
subject to fines and penalties as provided for under the act for failure to
diligently pursue response activity under section 20114(1)(g) of the act.
(6) Response activity undertaken by a person who is
liable that does not comprehensively address all contamination at a facility,
except unremediated releases addressed through the procedure set forth in this
rule, is considered an interim response and not a remedial action.
These administrative rules are provided as a free
service of the State Bar of Michigan Environmental Law Section. The administrative rules, which were
re-formatted for consistency, are not intended to replace official versions and
are subject to revision and/or repeal. The Environmental Law Section presents this information, without
warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy of the information,
timeliness, or completeness. If you believe the information is inaccurate,
out-of-date, or incomplete or if you have problems accessing or reading the information,
please send your concerns to the Section.