1 STATE OF MICHIGAN 2 STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN 3 MEETING of the REPRESENTATIVE 4 ASSEMBLY of the STATE BAR OF MICHIGAN 5 ________________________________/ 6 7 8 9 10 Proceedings had by the Representative Assembly of the 11 State Bar of Michigan at Kellogg Hotel and Conference 12 Center, Big Ten Room A, East Lansing, Michigan, on Saturday, 13 March 27, 2004, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. 14 15 16 AT HEADTABLE: 17 DANIEL M. LEVY, Chairperson 18 ELIZABETH A. JAMIESON, Vice-Chairperson 19 LORI A. BUITEWEG, Clerk 20 JOHN T. BERRY, Executive Director 21 HON. ARCHIE C. BROWN, Parliamentarian 22 GLENNA PETERS, Staff Member 23 24 25 METROPOLITAN REPORTING, INC. (517) 886-4068

1 CALENDAR ITEMS PAGE 2 Call to order 3 3 Certification of quorum 3 4 Adoption of proposed calendar 3 5 Summary of 11-14-03 proceedings approved 4 6 Filling of vacancies 4-5 7 Remarks by Daniel M. Levy, Chairperson 5-14 8 Remarks by Scott S. Brinkmeyer, President 15-23 9 Remarks by John T. Berry, Executive Director 24-30 10 Report on Administrative Order 2004-01 by 31-39 Janet Welch 11 Report of Reapportionment by James C. Horsch 40-41 12 Michigan Law Online report by Lisa Allen-Kost 42-55 13 and Lynn P. Chard 14 Representative Assembly Liaison Reports 57-61 Law Practice Management Section by 15 Vincent A. Romano 16 Representative Assembly Committee Reports Assembly Review Committee by Terri L. Stangl 62-65 17 Nominating and Awards by Thomas C. Rombach 66-69 Special Issues Committee by Ed Haroutunian 70-77 18 Consideration of Proposed Amendment to 78-104 19 MCR 2.112(K) (Non-Party Fault Issue) 20 Consideration of Proposed Revision to the 104-120 Juvenile Guardianship Court Rule 21 Motion to adjourn 121 22 23 24 25

1 East Lansing, Michigan 2 Saturday, March 27, 2004 3 10:19 a.m. 4 R E C O R D 5 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: Good morning, all. With 6 apologies for the traffic and for the fact that 7 apparently we don't have enough high school basketball 8 fans to know about such things in advance. I call on 9 the clerk to certify a quorum is present. 10 CLERK BUITEWEG: Quorum is present. 11 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: Call the meeting to order. 12 You have the proposed calendar in front of you. 13 Having had nobody contact me about possible 14 amendments, do I hear a motion to adopt it? 15 VOICE: So move. 16 VOICE: Second 17 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: All in favor. 18 Any opposed. 19 Without objections, the calendar is adopted. 20 You have before you the summary of 21 proceedings from the November 14th meeting. I have 22 not been contacted by anybody with amendments. Did 23 somebody want to move to adopt? 24 VOICE: So move. 25 VOICE: Support.

1 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: All in favor. 2 Any opposed. 3 Without objection, the summary is adopted. 4 Call upon the chair of the Nominating and 5 Awards Committee, Tom Rombach, to address item number 6 two. 7 MR. ROMBACH: Mr. Chair, Tom Rombach, 16th 8 circuit. On behalf of the Nominating and Awards 9 Committee, I would like to move for the admission to 10 this august group three individuals, first being from 11 the 6th judicial circuit, that being Marcia Cynthia 12 Ross of Farmington Hills, for an immediate vacancy and 13 balance of the term expiring in 2005. Marcia, could 14 you please stand up so people can judge your fitness 15 for office. 16 (Applause.) 17 MR. ROMBACH: From the 23rd judicial circuit 18 our next contestant for an immediate vacancy, the 19 balance of the term expiring 2006, is David Rifle of 20 Tawas. Is David here today? Okay, but he is going to 21 be in here anyway hopefully. 22 30th judicial circuit has two immediate 23 vacancies, balance of term expiring in 2004, Stephen 24 Gobbo of Lansing and Monique Pointer of Lansing are our 25 two nominees. If they could stand to be recognized.

1 There is Steve I see. There is Monique. Thank you 2 very much. I would like to move for their admission 3 to the Assembly. 4 VOICE: Support. 5 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: All in favor. 6 Any opposed. 7 Without opposition, they are currently 8 members. Welcome. 9 (Applause.) 10 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: A couple of more 11 housekeeping matters, one housekeeping, one matter of 12 personal privilege, before I go into formal remarks. 13 In terms of housekeeping, some of you apparently have 14 already received, others of you will be receiving a 15 letter shortly -- I just misplaced my copy of it -- 16 from Frank Lawrence regarding some litigation that the 17 Bar is involved with. I just wanted to assure you 18 that that matter is on the closed session agenda of 19 every Board of Commissioners meeting, which is where 20 it belongs, and we have Assembly members, myself and 21 Elizabeth, present at the executive meetings, with the 22 addition of Lori at the general board meetings, and we 23 are monitoring it. Feel free to look at it on your 24 own, but because it's litigation, that's about as far 25 as I can go at this point.

1 On a matter of personal privilege, before we 2 proceed any further, I was just informed by one of our 3 members of Clinton County that sometime over the 4 evening hours last night, or early hours this morning, 5 while on active duty in this neighborhood just a 6 little bit north of here, Clinton County Sheriff's 7 Department Deputy Perry Fillmore was killed in the 8 line of duty, and I would like if everybody would just 9 please stand for a moment of silence in his honor and 10 those who are protecting us and serving us each day. 11 (Moment of silence.) 12 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: Thank you, and thank you 13 on behalf of our Clinton County representatives as 14 well. 15 Some of you will know, some of you won't know 16 what I mean when I say Bartamaus taught us to look at 17 things a new way. It will tell you the people who are 18 laughing have been here more than three years. 19 Three years ago chair stood in this position 20 and taught us about instructiveness and informed us 21 about educators, about a character in the Bible, blind 22 individual who taught us that there are different ways 23 to look at things and that there are times when we 24 should stop and look at things anew. 25 And I wanted to sort of carry on from that

1 point of view based upon what the Assembly has done 2 since that point, since we started to look at things 3 that way. And I think that when we took a look at 4 things anew we learned that we needed to be, as an 5 Assembly, we needed to be seeking out issues, not 6 simply waiting for issues to find us, and that we 7 needed to be seeking out membership input, not waiting 8 for those members to find us. 9 We also needed to be speaking to the Board of 10 Commissioners and to the Bar staff, not waiting for 11 them to come and say what are you thinking and to earn 12 the respect of the court, of our fellow Bar members, 13 of the Board of Commissioners, of Bar officers. And, 14 if at that point in time we needed to look to the 15 Bible and look to Bartamaus for a little bit of 16 guidance, I think at this point in time, oddly enough, 17 maybe we ought to be looking at Alcoholics Anonymous, 18 and what I am referring to is the oath. I am not 19 quoting it absolutely, because I don't, fortunately, 20 have a coin in my pocket, but give us the strength to 21 change the things we can, give us the patience to 22 accept the things we cannot change, give us the wisdom 23 to know the difference, and to that I would want to 24 add give us the discretion to the client to go where 25 we should not go, no matter how tempting it may be.

1 We have earned the respect and we have the 2 respect now of the Supreme Court, in part because of 3 what we did at the November meeting with the ethics 4 rules, in part because of what we did prior to that 5 with the question of dues and what dues should be with 6 the strategic plan. We have that respect. That's 7 given us the strength. That's given us the strength 8 to have impact, that's given us the strength to cause 9 change. But because it's a respect and a power that 10 we have earned, it's one that we very quickly could 11 lose. 12 Not long ago, in fact, people thought the 13 Representative Assembly was probably on it's way out. 14 It was probably on it's last legs. It had become, in 15 many people's opinions, not a relevant body, not a 16 body that was representing membership interests, one 17 that was incapable of addressing very tough issues and 18 coming up with resolutions. 19 We proved them wrong, but the truth is, when 20 I ran for clerk, when I was elected clerk, not very 21 long ago, two and a half years ago, I figured it was 22 about 75 to 80 percent sure that I would finish the 23 year as a chair, because the Assembly had that many 24 people saying, you know, what is its value, and we 25 have shown them what the value is, and I don't think

1 that there is any concern that the Assembly is going 2 anywhere as a body in a negative sense in the 3 immediate future. And I think that's a very good 4 thing. 5 I think the role of the Assembly, the role 6 that we are supposed to be carrying out, the role that 7 we have been carrying out in recent years is critical 8 to the existence of the Bar itself. The Bar is a 9 mandatory dues organization, but it is a 10 representative organization. It is not something that 11 can be run by a small and somewhat arguably elite 12 group of people. There needs to be this bigger, 13 unwieldy though it may be, body that can actually 14 truly represent as best as possible the interests of 15 the larger Bar membership. 16 But we need to remember, as we approach that 17 responsibility, we need to remember several things. I 18 think we need to remember why we are here, we need to 19 remember what we can do, we need to remember what we 20 cannot do, and then we should add that we always need 21 to remember what we should not do. 22 We are here to represent the Bar membership, 23 to set policy for the Bar, as the rules state our job, 24 essentially to shepherd the direction the Bar is 25 taking, to shepherd where the Board of Commissioners

1 is going to set those broad policy concerns about the 2 direction that this Bar will be taking, to make sure 3 that it remains a body that is answering to the needs 4 of the membership, that is serving the interest of 5 lawyers throughout the state, and that it is serving 6 the interests of the justice system we are each sworn 7 to protect. 8 We can do each of those things. What we 9 cannot do, based upon our size, based upon Supreme 10 Court Rules, we cannot micro manage, we cannot as a 11 body of this size be involved in every indecision or 12 every facet of Bar activities. We need to focus on 13 those larger policy concerns. We cannot be involved, 14 over a hundred of us meeting three times a year, in 15 every day-to-day decision. 16 And we should not try to do what we cannot 17 do, because if we do we fail, and if the Assembly 18 fails, the Bar membership loses its ability to be 19 represented in discussions with the court and 20 discussions amongst the Board of Commissioners. But I 21 think the most important things are that we should not 22 ever go where the Bar has no business. 23 Again, we are a mandatory dues organization. 24 We should not be taking positions on behalf of the 25 State Bar on items that affect -- well, we should be

1 taking positions on items that affect our members 2 professionally as lawyers. We should be talking about 3 items that relate to the public, to Access to Justice, 4 to issues of that sort. 5 The Supreme Court has told us, Keller 6 decision, two administrative orders since then, one 7 which we will be discussing briefly later on, that 8 because we are a mandatory dues organization we need 9 to, we are required to stay to those areas to some 10 degree. 11 I think we need to understand that truthfully 12 if we are a representative body the Keller decision is 13 our friend, not our enemy, that there are things that 14 we should not be trying to claim that the State Bar 15 has an opinion on because we can create a 55 percent 16 majority on a given day in this body. We are here to 17 represent the Bar, we are here to represent all Bar 18 members, and there are items on which the Bar is 19 divided and that we should acknowledge that the Bar is 20 divided and leave it up to sections who can take 21 positions on those sorts of issues, leave it up to 22 individual Bar members to represent themselves, but 23 not pretend that there is a Bar policy, and we should 24 also be careful never to represent, even in an issue 25 where we belong, that we are speaking for the entire

1 Bar if that is not the case. 2 Had dues past by a majority of one, it would 3 have been inappropriate for us to go to the Supreme 4 Court and say this is the Bar's position. And we need 5 to be cautious of that. We need to remember that we 6 represent all members of the Bar. 7 And it's for this reason that I believe that 8 the Bar needs to sometimes refrain from addressing 9 what might be the big hot issues of the day, and while 10 we can take on some items, there are other items that 11 even if we could take on we should not, and it's for 12 that reason you don't see before you on the agenda 13 something I would hold very close, something that I 14 think does relate to some extent to the system of 15 justice, and that's the so-called civil rights 16 initiative. 17 As strongly as I believe that you cannot 18 solve a complex problem with a simplistic response and 19 as strongly as I believe that solving problems isn't 20 really the goal of that initiative, that ignoring 21 problems is the goal of that initiative, it is not 22 something that I am putting on the agenda today, it is 23 not something I have asked Rules and Calendar to put 24 on the calendar today, because it is something on 25 which there is no unified Bar. It is something, even

1 though it may have an impact on justice, on access to 2 the courts, it is something on which I believe the 3 Assembly needs to be cautious about not representing 4 the fact that there is a Bar opinion and leaving to 5 the members their ability to speak. 6 I say this to you today because we had the 7 vision not that many years ago to see where we could 8 go, and I think now we need to have the vision to see 9 where we should go and where we shouldn't go. We need 10 to be worried about maintaining the respect that we 11 have earned, maintaining our authority as a 12 Representative Assembly, as a representative body. 13 Getting to where we are from where we were five, seven 14 years ago was tough. Staying here may prove to be 15 tougher. 16 And it is with those thoughts in mind that, 17 also on a more housekeeping sort of subject, I would 18 call each person's attention to the 2004 election 19 notice. You have an amended version loose. For most 20 of you the version that's in your agenda is correct. 21 Look for your names. If your name is there and you 22 don't have a star next to it, your term is up this 23 year, you are eligible to run, and you will find a 24 nominating petition on the table also. Today is a 25 good day for most of you to start filling it out and

1 start using it. 2 More importantly though, for those of you who 3 don't see your name there because your term is not up 4 or for those of you who see your name but see other 5 spots are available or see spots in other counties, 6 people who are not eligible, places where there are 7 openings, one of our responsibilities is to think of 8 people that we would like to have representing us and 9 to go back to our communities, go back to our 10 circuits, and convince those people that this is an 11 important body, a body that could benefit from their 12 wisdom and encourage them to run. 13 Our ability to serve as a Representative 14 Assembly depends upon us having representatives from 15 each of the circuits present, people who are here, 16 people who, like you, care about the issues that we 17 are addressing, and I would urge each of you, if 18 eligible, to start filling out that petition so that 19 you can be here with us -- well, be here without me, 20 but with the rest of you -- next year and for the time 21 in the future. We have very, very important work 22 ahead of us. 23 With that I would end my remarks. I would 24 ask that Scott Brinkmeyer, who is the State Bar 25 president who was kind enough to join us this morning,

1 take the microphone and address us. 2 PRESIDENT BRINKMEYER: Thank you, Dan. The 3 first thing I want to do is to thank each and every 4 one of you in this room for showing up today. I 5 remember when I first ran for this body back in the 6 early '90s and my first term of office I was convinced 7 to run for Representative Assembly by Jon Muth, 8 frankly the longest sitting and one of the best 9 presidents I think we have ever had in the State Bar, 10 and at the end of that first term I told him I was 11 going to quit. I said, I am bored to death. They are 12 not doing anything there. It's not interesting. 13 Everybody wants to leave by lunchtime. People don't 14 want to show up, and they don't want to stay when they 15 get here. 16 I think a lot of that has changed. I am very 17 proud to be a member of this organization. I hope 18 each and every one of you are, and I think the fact 19 that you are here shows that you are. What you have 20 done over the past few years is to be applauded. Your 21 leadership, at least since I left, has been 22 outstanding, possible exception of Rombach, but we 23 will forgive him for that. He is always running for 24 office or he has other things to attend to. We hope 25 he wins. He did a great job. But you are to be

1 applauded. 2 I am halfway through this year. We are 3 halfway through this year, so you will be rid of me in 4 about six months, but I am going to tell you in the 5 meantime I am having one heck of a good time. 6 I spent yesterday with Mark Brissette and his 7 circuit in Bay City. I have gotten around to a lot of 8 your circuits, to John Dewane's and others. I was 9 down for Al Butzbaugh's swearing in, another great 10 leader of the State Bar, and I am having a blast. I 11 wouldn't trade it for anything. I wish I could get 12 paid for this job. Otherwise I am having a very good 13 time. 14 Dan asked me to talk to you about the ABA 15 meeting this year. As you may or may not know, as 16 president, any president is automatically a member of 17 the House of Delegates in Michigan. There are 18 different ways you can designate who are your 19 representatives, but our president is always a member 20 of the House of Delegates, and I went back and I 21 looked over the agenda and what was done in 22 San Antonio. John and I were out there and others. 23 There were about seven or eight of us there, 24 delegates, and I confirm that truly this was the most 25 boring ABA House of Delegates meeting in memory, so I

1 am not going to share that with you. If you want to 2 talk about what went on there, we can, but I don't 3 think it would be of interest to you. 4 I would just like to share with you for a 5 couple of minutes part of what I have written about in 6 this month's Bar Journal. When you get back to your 7 offices on Monday, go out to the reception room, 8 retrieve it from the coffee table, take it to your 9 office, it looks like this. And there is an article 10 in there that I think may have some meaning to you. 11 You won't think so at first when you are reading 12 through it, but there are some very important points 13 that I thought about and that led me to write this 14 article. And it has to do with our profession and 15 what's happening nationally in terms of our 16 profession. 17 We are, again, a profession under attack, and I 18 want to underscore that, we are under attack. The 19 United States Chamber of Commerce has taken out 20 advertisements throughout the country on the basis of 21 a study that was done that rates the judicial systems 22 of our 50 states and basically is critical of those 23 judicial systems and the tort systems in those states 24 for the frivolous lawsuit type of points that have 25 been made politically in the recent past.

1 Our ABA president, Dennis Archer, has written 2 a letter to the Chamber president, and he has asked 3 that that letter be published in the papers of the 4 states in which these advertisements are being run. 5 This time they are not directly critical of lawyers as 6 they were in the last election. They are critical of 7 judges and judicial decisions, and they claim to have 8 data that supports the notion that every citizen of 9 the United States is paying $806 per person to support 10 this allegedly inept and inappropriate tort system of 11 ours, and Dennis takes them to task for that because, 12 as he suggests, when you look at the data behind that 13 study, it is full of flaws. 14 If you want to get that information and 15 peruse it for yourselves, merely e-mail me at 16 sbrinkmeyer@MMBJlaw.com, and I will send that to you. 17 It's being pandered through at least the states that 18 they feel are the worst. Michigan is in the middle, 19 by the way, so we are probably not getting -- we are 20 about 23rd, if I recall correctly. We are not getting 21 as much of this as many of the other states are. 22 But we are under attack, and one of the 23 reasons we are is probably to be laid at our doorstep, 24 not entirely, of course, but some, because, you know, 25 our brethren have done some things in terms of major

1 victories, if you will, tobacco suits, asbestos, 2 et cetera, that have drawn the attention of a lot of 3 businesses, and whether you support or oppose these 4 notions, there is a lot of money involved, and 5 wherever there is money, there is politics, as we all 6 know, and there is going to be people for and against, 7 and we are again at the forefront of this battle 8 ongoing Unites States-wide. 9 Why is it important to you, and I ask that 10 question, and I try to answer it in this article. 11 It's important to you because we remain today a 12 self-regulated profession. That is critical that we 13 retain self regulation, but there are more and more 14 efforts at a national level to have federal 15 intervention in the regulation of what we do, and not 16 only will that impact the rules on the practice of law 17 and our ethics rules, but they will also impact more 18 and more in the future who will be allowed to practice 19 in our states and under what circumstances. 20 We are, as you know, a global society and a 21 global economy today, at least we think 10,000 lawyers 22 are now making their living abroad, and we are allowed 23 to practice in other countries. They are like 24 different states, but each country is a country unto 25 itself. They don't have 50 states where you have a

1 different set of rules in every state. 2 I want to applaud today your efforts in 3 reviewing and making recommendations to the Supreme 4 Court on our ethics rules. That, as you know, was an 5 outgrowth of the ABA Ethics 2000 initiative. We are 6 at the forefront of that. It is critical, what you 7 did here is critical and will have an impact 8 nationwide on what happens in the future because, as 9 this economy grows more and more global, more and more 10 attorneys from other countries are going to want to 11 come in to this country and our states and to practice 12 law. 13 As you know, every politician from the top to 14 the bottom wants to make sure that our economies are 15 robust, and, therefore, they want the impediments to 16 those robust economies to be reduced. The only way 17 they are going to do that for international lawyers is 18 to make sure that they can move from state to state 19 with relative ease. That was part of why the ABA 20 endorsed states looking at their rules and to make 21 them relatively equivalent so that the interstate and 22 international economies could remain robust and 23 lawyers could move around. 24 Now, we resist that by nature, we don't want 25 the competition, but it's here, and it's coming more

1 and more, and what will happen if we don't remain 2 vigilant as we have been, as you have been, on behalf 3 of our members is that more and more national level, 4 federal level policy makers will seek to impose rules 5 upon us, and we will have less and less to say about 6 how we practice law, who practices among us, and what 7 we do and how we handle those who don't practice 8 appropriately. 9 So I am here today really to applaud what you 10 have done, to thank you for doing it on behalf of all 11 of our members, and to encourage you to keep doing it. 12 I know it's difficult. We have got some folks from 13 the U.P., from Northern Michigan, from the thumb, from 14 the west who come, they came yesterday. One of them I 15 talked to got here at 2:00 in the morning and started 16 looking at his materials, naturally, when he got into 17 the hotel this morning. 18 But I really applaud you for this type of 19 commitment to the profession, and I am seeing that 20 around the state. When John and I and Lisa and others 21 talk to your circuits, your members, be encouraged. 22 When you show up here, don't lose sight of the fact 23 that you represent your constituencies and those 24 lawyers around this state, 35,000 plus strong, who 25 need your voice here, and don't fail to recognize how

1 important what you do is to the profession. 2 This is going to be a fight. Our profession 3 remains under attack. It will continue to remain 4 under attack. Don't get discouraged because you hear 5 this, whether it's at the Rotary Club or the country 6 club or the Lion's Club or wherever it may be that you 7 hear it socially and you hear the lawyers jokes and 8 those types of things. Frankly, I have spoken to a 9 lot of nonlawyer groups, and I have told them that I 10 think that a lot of this comes from jealousy. 11 We really are at the forefront. You can't 12 open a newspaper, a magazine, you can't turn on a TV 13 set and not hear of lawyers doing something. It may 14 not always be cast in the best light, but the fact is 15 that we are representing the rights of all of the 16 citizens of America every day in every state and every 17 city of the country, and we can't forget how important 18 that is, how important this rule of law is to all of 19 us, and you are emblematic of the best of our 20 profession. 21 If you do go and read the article, and I hope 22 you will, you will see at the end that there is 23 something I point out and remind you all of, and I 24 just want to leave you today with just one little bit 25 of that to remember, and I wonder how recently you

1 have recalled this to mind, but I ask you in the 2 article to recall, and I will just read the last part 3 of it. I will in all other respects conduct myself 4 personally and professionally in conformity with the 5 high standards of conduct imposed on members of the 6 Bar as conditions for the privilege to practice law in 7 this state. 8 Each and every one of us swore that when we 9 got a license to practice law. Go back and revisit 10 that often and remind yourself what you swore and how 11 important it is. Thank you. 12 (Applause.) 13 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: I want to personally thank 14 Scott. He mentioned his leadership. He didn't point 15 out, though, in the detail I would like the fact that 16 he is one of those leaders who early on saw where we 17 could be going and started to point us in the right 18 direction. For that we owe him a debt of gratitude, 19 but more so throughout his years on the Board of 20 Commissioners and now this year as president, he has 21 not forgotten where he came from in terms of our 22 Assembly, and he has always spoken out to make sure 23 that the Assembly's views are heard, and we thank you 24 for that. 25 I would then like to introduce John Berry,

1 the executive director, and thank him before he speaks 2 just for understanding what the Assembly could do and 3 for expecting us to lead, not to follow, which had 4 been what was expected of us not all that long ago, 5 but to expect us to be given the facts and trusting us 6 to do with them what was right rather than telling us 7 where we should be going. 8 MR. BERRY: Well, I have got to lead off, I 9 have got one compliment and one question for our 10 chair. The positive comment I want to say is I have 11 gotten the opportunity to spend some time with our 12 chair over the last, since the last meeting, and I 13 have been so impressed not only with his leadership 14 but his thoughtfulness about everything that he deals 15 with, whether it's this organization or the Bar, 16 serving the public. Never from a standpoint of 17 protecting turf or from sticking the cord in the way 18 you are supposed to do it, but every issue that comes 19 in front of him looking at it. Now that's your 20 compliment. 21 The comment or question I have is whose idea 22 was it to follow comments as strong as yours and the 23 president's and put me up third. I would like to -- I 24 would like next time to try to figure out how we can 25 work that out in another way. But it's interesting,

1 as I listen to both, we did not talk about our 2 presentations. At least I did not talk with our 3 president, I did not talk to our chair, but it's 4 amazing how all three of our comments are 5 interconnected and are very similar. 6 As the executive director of this Bar, I have 7 a lot of roles, but one of the roles that I think is 8 the most important is to connect our strategic plan, 9 the Bar's strategic plan, what was approved by this 10 Rep Assembly, Bar, and Board to every generation of 11 new leadership to continually, until the leadership 12 changes it, to remind us and keep us focused on that 13 and to go forward with that role. 14 And this strategic plan is dramatic in its 15 change. Both the chair and president spoke of that 16 change, dramatic change, within the last three years, 17 and I want to comment just briefly about that as well. 18 As we walked into this meeting we were met by 19 a number of partisan political folks. Some of you may 20 wish that you had gotten stickers put on, and others 21 may have avoided it like the plague, but it 22 reminded me of a Bar Journal article I wrote, one of 23 the first ones I wrote, before I knew too much about 24 this state, and it was called Wolverines or Spartans. 25 Now, I don't know how many of you read that

1 article, but it reminded me -- the purpose of that 2 article was to say our new strategic plan is about a 3 Bar which should welcome and people should feel 4 comfortable in, whether they are democrats or 5 republicans, whether or not they are conservatives or 6 liberals, and I added whether or not they were 7 Wolverines or Spartans. 8 I got a number of comments that said they 9 were with me up until the last part of that, and 10 obviously I needed to spend more time in the state 11 before I started writing articles about Wolverines and 12 Spartans. So this is, forget the last part of it, but 13 the first part of it, and that's what our president 14 was talking about, which is focusing on our 15 profession, focusing on making it more competent, 16 ethical, professional, dealing with these dramatic, 17 dramatic changes that are going on, some of which are 18 not bad. 19 Change can be good. Moving from Florida to 20 Michigan was a good thing. It was one of the best 21 things my wife and I ever did, but it's scary, and 22 sometimes you worry about it, sometimes you think 23 about it. 24 But change necessarily is not good or bad. 25 You have to look at each part of it, and I think part

27
  1        of what's going on right now is that sort of reaction.  
  2        That's why this is an exciting and important time for 
  3        all of us.
  4                 Just briefly, to report to you how your Bar 
  5        is keeping on focus about that new Wolverine and 
  6        Spartan attitude and with that new attitude of making 
  7        sure we stay within Keller, and as your chair pointed 
  8        out, even within Keller our plan says that we should 
  9        be a Bar focused on those things that unite us not 
 10        divide us on a regular basis.  It doesn't means at 
 11        times we aren't going to disagree, but the focus of 
 12        our money, our resources should be focused on those 
 13        things which draw us together to make the profession 
 14        better, and let us do the political battles somewhere 
 15        else in this world.  That's what the strategic plan is 
 16        about, and what I report to you today is, and what you 
 17        are going to hear from other staff members and from 
 18        Lynn Chard is that's what we are focused on.
 19                 I am not going to steal the thunder.  
 20        Michigan online, fantastic.  This is helping members 
 21        become more efficient.  It's providing services 
 22        directly to them.  Our public resource center 
 23        developed to help with legislation.  Not to tell our 
 24        members where to go, but to give the information so 
 25        that they on their own can work through sessions and

28
  1        then through the Bar can make decisions about where 
  2        they are going to go.
  3                 I want to report to you about our ethics 
  4        school.  I mentioned this once to you before.  We had 
  5        our second ethics diversion program, and Tom Byerley 
  6        heads up our program with that.  This is a program, 
  7        instead of prosecuting lawyers who are getting into 
  8        minor difficulties because of stress or because maybe 
  9        their law office management techniques are not the 
 10        best, maybe their interpersonal skills could be 
 11        improved, maybe they are strong advocates but maybe 
 12        they just don't have that warm, fuzzy feeling with 
 13        their clients and they are causing difficulties and 
 14        complaints.  We bring them into a room like this -- 
 15        and let me ask you, how many people here have taught 
 16        either in school or seminar or programs, raise your 
 17        hands.  Almost everyone.
 18                 You have never taught a class like walking 
 19        into a group of lawyers who have been initially 
 20        prosecuted for minor offenses and who look you in the 
 21        face and probably want to rip your heart out at the 
 22        moment at the beginning of class, but by the end of 
 23        the class understand what this Bar is about now, and 
 24        by the end of the class uniformly they say everyone of 
 25        you should be mandated to go to that class, because it

29
  1        takes every possible problem that could happen between 
  2        a lawyer at the beginning of the representation to the 
  3        end, and it says how can you make that a positive 
  4        situation, how can you avoid complaints, even if they 
  5        are not legitimate complaints, how can you work better 
  6        with your clients, and by the end of the program, 
  7        that's what we are talking about with our new Bar.  We 
  8        are putting our resources to helping them be able to 
  9        serve the public better.  And, you know what, if we do 
 10        that, then that future that our president is trying to 
 11        lead us to and our chair is leading to and all of the 
 12        leaders will, that will be protected, because the 
 13        public will want to come to lawyers because they will 
 14        understand that lawyers are the place to go, and I 
 15        think that's what our Bar is devoting its time to.
 16                 Good news for you, we did hire a new UPL 
 17        counsel and we are going forward in looking at that 
 18        issue.  But our future is to decide and to look even 
 19        more on how this profession has changed and what 
 20        lawyers can do, should do, what others can do or should 
 21        do and where we draw the line in the sand, and we have 
 22        to make sure that the public is protected in its 
 23        future action.  
 24                 One last work that we are working on with the 
 25        deans in this state, and I chair the American Bar

1 Association's Professional Committee. We for the next 2 two years will be working with every law school in 3 this country to try to develop new ways to educate 4 students for the actual preparation of the practice of 5 law. The mind, the hands, the heart, and the 6 understanding of what they are going to face with this 7 new profession. We are excited about that work as 8 well. 9 So with those comments I just want to tell 10 you again what a pleasure it is to be your executive 11 director. I appreciate a few moments to make a few 12 comments to you, and if you looked at all of the theme 13 of the three people that spoke to you, that theme is 14 one that I believe we are on the right path, we are 15 heading in the right direction, and it's a pleasure to 16 be part of it. Thank you very much. 17 (Applause.) 18 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: I think everyone has met 19 Janet Welch. Janet Welch is general counsel for the 20 State Bar. We asked her to come and speak to us today 21 with a specific question in mind. The Supreme Court 22 recently, as most of you probably know, issued a 23 follow-up administrative order to Keller decision and 24 the administrative order, and the question we put to 25 her was does this change anything and, if so, how.

1 MS. WELCH: Good morning. I knew I was going 2 to have three tough acts to follow, so I really tried 3 to come up with a Keller joke and I failed. Instead 4 we have a Power Point. 5 Administrative Order 2004-1 was adopted by 6 the Michigan Supreme Court in February at our request 7 to modernize the Keller order of 1993. The heart of 8 the administrative order is the court's response to 9 issues relating to the State Bar's public policy 10 procedures and efficacy based on the U.S. Supreme 11 Court decision Keller V. California, and because 12 that's the heart of the order I thought it would be a 13 good idea to review what Keller is. 14 Keller arose in the late '80s when Eddie 15 Keller and 20 of his fellow members of the State Bar 16 of California sued the Bar claiming that the 17 Bar expended their mandatory dues to advance political 18 and ideological causes to which they did not subscribe 19 and that their compelled financial support of these 20 activities violated their First and Fourteenth 21 Amendment rights to freedom of speech and association. 22 They were unsuccessful in front of the 23 California Supreme Court and appealed to the U.S. 24 Supreme Court, which heard the case in June of 1990 25 and gave them partial satisfaction with the decision

1 issued in June of 1990. 2 The court said that the compelled association 3 and integrated Bar are justified by the state's 4 interest in regulating the legal profession and 5 approving the quality of legal services. The State 6 Bar may constitutionally fund activities germane to 7 those goals out of the mandatory dues of all members. 8 It may not, however, in such a manner fund activities 9 of an ideological nature which fall outside of those 10 areas of activity, and they also said that the guide 11 and standard must be whether the challenged 12 expenditures are necessarily or reasonably incurred 13 for the purpose of regulating the legal profession or 14 improving the quality of the legal service available 15 to people of the state. 16 In response to the Keller decision, which 17 sent shock waves through mandatory state bars 18 throughout the country, the State Bar of Michigan 19 asked the Michigan Supreme Court to adopt an order 20 regulating ideological activities in consonance with 21 the Keller order. And the order that they adopted 22 addressed ideological activity generally, activities 23 intended to influence legislation, which is really 24 where the most particular provisions of the order lie, 25 challenges regarding State Bar activities that might

1 not be in consonance with the order, and other State 2 Bar activities. All four of those categories had been 3 maintained for ten years. 4 The fourth category I think which addressed 5 lawyers auxiliary issues, I think historically was 6 probably the State Bar saying, well, we have your 7 attention, can you just address this issue about 8 funding of Law Day. 9 That provision has dropped off in the revised 10 order, and I have had questions about that, and the 11 Supreme Court itself says they are trying to make the 12 order consistent, keep it to the Keller purposes. 13 The heart of administrate order 1993-5, now 14 2004-1, is the list of activities for which the State 15 Bar can expend mandatory dues, and they include, and 16 this is the entire universe, the regulation and 17 discipline of attorneys, the improvement of the 18 functioning of the courts, the availability of legal 19 services to society, the regulation of attorney trust 20 accounts, the regulation of the legal profession, 21 including the education, the ethics, the competency, 22 and the integrity of the profession. 23 I am going to go through each of those one by 24 one to give you a sense of how we have responded to 25 interpreting what each of those categories allows us

1 to do. I am putting the regulation on discipline of 2 attorneys together and the regulation of the legal 3 profession, including the education, the ethics, 4 competency and integrity of the profession, because we 5 are interpreting those as essentially the same 6 permission. 7 And our responses to those have included 8 court rule and statutory provisions concerning 9 admissions, character and fitness and discipline, 10 ethics rules, ideological activities concerning legal 11 education and license restrictions and revocation, 12 including those that are in statute. 13 The improvement of the functioning of the 14 courts we interpret as allowing us to spend mandatory 15 dues on ideological activities addressing judicial 16 resources, court funding, court organization processes 17 and structure, and all court rules. 18 The availability of legal services to 19 society we have interpreted as allowing ideological 20 activities concerning programs for indigent civil 21 legal representation, identification of barriers to 22 access in legislation, pro bono activity, and 23 economics of the legal profession that affect the 24 availability of legal services to society, 25 potentially, for example, any tax on legal services,

1 loser pay legislation, and contingency fee proposals. 2 And, finally, the regulation of attorney trust 3 accounts is pretty self evident. IOLTA addresses that 4 in the ethics rules. 5 2004-1, as 1993-5, specifically exempts 6 sections because they are funded by mandatory dues. 7 The need to distinguish between the positions of 8 sections and those of the State Bar as a whole has 9 always been recognized in the State Bar bylaws. And 10 we have in our bylaws a statement that says that only, 11 the State Bar policy may be adopted and declared only 12 by the Board of Commissioners and Representative 13 Assembly, of course, and that no section or other 14 entity of the State Bar can represent the State Bar 15 without being authorized to do so. And the State Bar 16 bylaws have also contained rules for how sections can 17 communicate their public policy provisions. 18 Because the State Bar's ideological 19 activities are limited and the sections are not, the 20 need to distinguish between the positions of the State 21 Bar as a whole and the sections really have acquired 22 added significance since Keller, and there has been 23 increasing complaint over the last ten years about the 24 inability of legislators and sometimes even the court 25 to distinguish between whether a position was being

36
  1        advocated by a section or whether it was being 
  2        advocated by the Bar as a whole.
  3                 Part of what the Supreme Court did in the 
  4        revised order is to attempt to address that confusion.  
  5        In 2003 the State Bar amended its bylaws to help 
  6        address that, to modernize and strengthen its public 
  7        policy provisions, including communications of 
  8        sections and committees, and we asked the Supreme 
  9        Court to modify the order in accordance with these 
 10        provisions.  
 11                 The new Keller order did everything that we 
 12        asked it to do and a little bit more.  It permits the 
 13        State Bar to provide notice of pending public policy 
 14        actions by website posting, which allows us to act a 
 15        little bit faster.  It eliminates the provision for 
 16        compulsory arbitration of member challenges in favor 
 17        of appeals to the Michigan Supreme Court.
 18                 In the entire 11 years since Keller was, 
 19        since the Keller order was adopted we had two 
 20        challenges, none of which required arbitration, and we 
 21        decided that it would be better to jettison that 
 22        fairly cumbersome provision, and it also rescinded the 
 23        provision concerning the lawyers auxiliary.  
 24                 The Supreme Court also added the following 
 25        requirements for sections communicating public policy

1 provisions, and this is an area of the order that went 2 a little farther than we asked the Supreme Court to go 3 in putting requirements on sections to communicate, 4 and this may be something that you have heard from 5 sections about. 6 Whenever a section engages in any ideological 7 activities, it must include on the first page of each 8 submission before the text begins and in print larger 9 than the statement's text a disclosure indicating, and 10 here are the provisions of what sections now must say, 11 that the section is not the State Bar of Michigan but 12 rather a section whose membership is voluntary; that 13 the position expressed is that of the section only, 14 and that the State Bar has no position on the matter, 15 or if the State Bar has a position on the matter what 16 that position is, the total membership of the section, 17 the process used by the section to take an ideological 18 position, the number of members of the decision-making 19 body, and the number who voted in favor and opposed to 20 the position. 21 All of these the Supreme Court has told us 22 are, they feel will help address the confusion 23 between, the possible confusion between a position 24 expressed by a section of the State Bar and the State 25 Bar as a whole.

38
  1                 And, finally, the order says that if a section 
  2        is communicating orally it must also communicate the 
  3        substance of what is required in written 
  4        communication.  
  5                 These provisions, as I said, go a little bit 
  6        beyond what we thought was needed, but we want to help 
  7        sections respond appropriately, conform to the order's 
  8        requirements, and the way that we are hoping to do 
  9        this is through our Public Policy Resource Center.
 10                 The Public Policy Resource Center has a 
 11        number of new tools that help not only sections but 
 12        all members be more effective in their public policy 
 13        advocacy.  Has electronic links -- if you haven't 
 14        visited the site, visit it -- to all bills of interest 
 15        to the profession by practice category, which helps 
 16        sections really see what it is that's going on on a 
 17        weekly basis.
 18                 We have a weekly public policy newsletter 
 19        which highlights section positions.  We have internal 
 20        operating procedures that expedite state court action 
 21        on public policy items.  And, finally, and this is the 
 22        most important thing for sections in response to the 
 23        new order, we have a template onsite that sections can 
 24        use to fill out to report their public policy 
 25        positions.

1 This shows you a little bit what the Public 2 Policy Resource Center looks like. We will just spin 3 through what it looks like and get to the template. 4 When a section enters this information, what 5 we will do at the Bar is take that information and 6 generate a cover letter for each section that responds 7 specifically to the requirements of Administrative 8 Order 2004-1. 9 I want you to know that I didn't coordinate 10 what I put together with what Dan had to say, but I 11 want to end with something that reinforces what Dan 12 says, which is that we have to put all of these 13 requirements in the context of our strategic plan, 14 which is that the State Bar of Michigan will 15 aggressively advocate for issues that support its 16 statement of purpose, minimize divisiveness and are 17 achievable. And I think what we are doing to respond 18 to what the Supreme Court has told us to do really 19 advances that goal. Thank you. 20 (Applause.) 21 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: Those of you familiar with 22 the court rules and the Bar rules governing us are 23 familiar with the fact that every six years we 24 reapportion the Board of Commissioners and the 25 Representative Assembly. The Assembly is not a

1 process that takes a lot of individual input. It is a 2 little bit more routine, but what we did ask Jim 3 Horsch, who has got a long title that I have always 4 translated as CFO, but I guess includes administrative 5 responsibilities like whatever computer process it is 6 that does this, to at least clue us in as to how it 7 was done and what changes there are. 8 MR. HORSCH: Thank you, Dan. In your 9 advanced materials under reapportionment there is an 10 exhibit that shows the reapportionment, and that has 11 been updated with an exhibit to correct a 12 transposition at your tables, and basically this was a 13 mathematical calculation that looked at the number of 14 members in each circuit and compares that to the total 15 population, and as a result of that there are changes 16 in the seats that are assigned to each circuit that 17 make up the 142 members of this body. 18 There were five circuits that were impacted 19 after looking at that proportion of the attorney 20 population and each circuit to the total, and I will 21 read those to you. Wayne County, which is 3rd 22 Circuit, went from 22 seats to 20, so they went down 23 by two seats. The 6th Circuit, Oakland County, 24 increased by one seat from 26 to 27. Circuit 30, 25 Ingham County, went from eight seats to seven seats,

1 so they reduced one seat. Lenewee County, Circuit 39, 2 increased from one seat to two seats, so they gained 3 one seat, and finally Ingham County -- excuse me, 4 Eaton County, Circuit 56, increased from one seat to 5 two seats, so they went up by one also. 6 And, Dan, I am available for questions if 7 anyone has any questions on this mathematical 8 computation. 9 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: Seeing no questions, I 10 just wanted to add, and the reason I had my name down 11 here too, is that in addition to doing the 12 mathematical computations that determine the number of 13 seats, we looked at, as the rule required us to do, we 14 looked at the apportionment within the circuit of the 15 election cycles, and discovered that, for example, 16 places like Wayne had 22 seats, becoming 20 seats, but 17 of those 20 seats exactly one was up this year, and 18 the rules require that they be staggered so that one 19 third is up each year in a circuit of that size. 20 So what we have done is listed on occasion in 21 a few places election cycles where we will be electing 22 people for two years rather than three in order to 23 bridge those gaps and try and level things out so that 24 in the next couple of years you will see once in a 25 while in the larger circuits that what was the end of

1 a three-year term is now going to be elected for a 2 two-year term, and the purpose of that is just so we 3 have some of the balance that's required as we go 4 along. 5 We talked a lot about -- thank you, Jim. 6 (Applause.) 7 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: We have talked a lot about 8 the fact that the Bar needs to be attentive to its 9 membership and provide its membership with tools and 10 with services, but what we have, while we have been 11 talking, other people have actually been doing it, and 12 I would like to recognize and thank Lisa Allen-Kost 13 and Lynn Chard, who are two of those people who have 14 actually been coming up with ways that we as a Bar can 15 be serving our membership and will be presenting one 16 that I think is a pretty spectacular method of doing 17 same. 18 MS. ALLEN-KOST: Good morning. I have the 19 pleasure of talking to you today about something that 20 is very near and dear to my heart, and that is the 21 State Bar's relationship with ICLE and Michigan Law 22 Online. I am going to tell you a little bit about the 23 historic background behind the creation of this 24 product and our continued relationship with ICLE, and 25 I am going to turn you over to Lynn, who is really

1 going to walk you through the product. 2 When I came to the Bar seven years ago I had 3 the question, What is ICLE? It was one of the first 4 questions I remember asking, and somebody said, That's 5 our education provider, and they are one of our 6 competitors. And that perplexed me, because I had 7 been working for the Dairy Association before that, 8 and the education component of our association was 9 very, very important to us and helped us create value 10 for the organization, so I had trouble understanding 11 why anyone would consider ICLE a competitor and not a 12 partner. And over the last seven years we have worked 13 very hard at the State Bar of Michigan to treat ICLE 14 as a partner rather than a competitor. 15 Four years ago we started a conversation with 16 Lynn -- I think you probably recall this, Lynn -- in 17 Brighton where I was really pleased to discover that 18 ICLE also saw the positive value in partnership, and 19 Lynn and I spent about an hour outside of a restaurant 20 talking about the possibilities. 21 Three years ago I had a breakfast meeting 22 with Lynn that actually turned into a lunch meeting, 23 if you will recall, and we talked more about it and 24 what the possibilities were for our relationship. 25 Three years ago our organization did some

1 research with new members, and we were surprised to 2 discover that new members didn't really have a clear 3 distinction between ICLE and the State Bar of 4 Michigan. In fact, they thought many of the materials 5 that the State Bar was sending them were from ICLE and 6 vice versa. 7 Three years ago we also placed in our 8 strategic plan a goal of improving our relationship 9 with ICLE, and we are pleased to discover that ICLE 10 had also placed into its strategic plan the exact same 11 goal. 12 One year ago we began working on specific 13 joint projects. We developed this year a cobranding 14 agreement with ICLE which assures that both 15 organizations are branding each organization, and you 16 will see now on all of your ICLE materials that there 17 will be a tag line that says the educational provider 18 for the State Bar of Michigan. 19 We also instituted or incorporated ICLE 20 financially and structurally into the organization. 21 We added Lynn to the Membership Services Committee, 22 and she has been a vital part of that committee for 23 over a year. We added Lynn to our Meeting Planning 24 and Events Committees, and we have been working 25 jointly with ICLE to develop the annual meeting, Bar

1 leadership forum. They have been instrumental and 2 will continue that work over this next year. 3 And last but not least, we developed a really 4 great product called Michigan Law Online, and that was 5 really based on a conversation, a long conversation 6 with John Berry and Lynn, about the creation of this 7 product and the possibilities of offering a free 8 primary legal research product to Michigan State Bar 9 members. 10 We believe and ICLE believes that the 11 partnership between our two organizations increases 12 the value of State Bar membership to all of our 13 members, and I am really excited to turn this over to 14 Lynn, who is going to tell you more about the product. 15 Thank you. 16 (Applause.) 17 MS. CHARD: Thank you, Lisa. I would like to 18 say that ICLE really has been honored to be working on 19 this product on behalf of Bar members, and it's really 20 been a pleasure to work with John Berry and Lisa 21 Allen-Kost, Nancy Brown, and their staffs. It's been 22 a very rewarding experience. 23 Now, with respect to Michigan Law Online, 24 let's get started with looking at what is available 25 there. You are going to have lots of cases, thousands

1 of cases, all the published cases from Court of 2 Appeals as well as the unpublished cases going 3 forward. We started with 2003 and going forward. 4 For the Michigan Supreme Court we are going 5 cases back to 1942 and orders back since 1966, which 6 is the beginning of when the Supreme Court issued 7 orders. 8 With respect to rules, we have the Michigan 9 Court Rules, the Michigan Rules of Evidence, and the 10 Rules of Professional Conduct. 11 Now, with respect to who will get this 12 service, all Michigan Bar members in good standing. 13 That will be both active and inactive members who have 14 paid their dues, because, as you know, there was a 15 change in the dues structure. 16 In order to access the service, you are going 17 to need a user name and password, and we are going to 18 start sending the notices out this week, starting 19 Monday. We are going to be sending notices to Bar 20 members. The first wave will be in batches by e-mail, 21 so everybody that has given the Bar their e-mail 22 address should be getting a notice over the next week 23 that gives you a user name and password that you can 24 use. 25 In addition, we will be publishing a lot of

1 notices, certainly it will be in the Bar Journal and 2 e-journal, to let people know about this. In case 3 they haven't gotten a password via e-mail, they can 4 simply call up ICLE and ask to get one, and they will 5 be given one. And I believe the Bar also plans to 6 follow up with letters to people who do not have 7 e-mail addresses on file. 8 Now, how do you get started with using the 9 service? The database itself, the database of cases 10 and rules, resides on the server at ICLE, but you can 11 access it by going to the State Bar site or ICLE site. 12 The State Bar site, I believe in their left-hand 13 column there will be a link to the service, so you 14 just click on that and you would get to the log-in 15 section. 16 You would need to type in your user name and 17 password and then also a screen will appear that will 18 ask you -- I think your basic information about your 19 address and P number should come right up, I believe, 20 as long as we have you on record. If not, then you 21 would type that in, indicate areas of practice, and 22 also read a licensing agreement, because you are 23 basically getting a license to use all of this 24 information. And the licensing agreement would say 25 you agree to use it, use it in your practice, that

1 anybody working with you, support staff, can use it. 2 They need to use your user name and password, because 3 it is only Bar members who are going to be getting 4 this, and you are agreeing not to copy it or sell it 5 or give it to others. 6 So you click an agreement to that, and then 7 you are into it, and you only see all that information 8 the first time. Once you log in, once you have got 9 your user name and password and logged in and then you 10 use it from the same computer, it will remember it, so 11 that's just a one-time process. 12 Once you get in, this is what you are going 13 to see. You can see at the top we have the 14 cobranding of the State Bar of Michigan and ICLE. You 15 are probably starting to get familiar with the new 16 logo use of the SBM for the State Bar of Michigan. 17 They are above the screen buttons at the top there 18 that can take you quickly back to the State Bar site 19 or to ICLE's website. 20 On the left-hand column there is an ad for 21 ICLE's partnership, there is a browse button where you 22 can simply browse, select different collections and 23 browse if you want to do that, and there are links to 24 other primary, free primary information that is very 25 good, like the legislative services site that has the

1 MCL. But it's in the main area, the main search area 2 there, that is the heart of the service. 3 If you know the citation to a case that you 4 want, one of the quickest ways to get it is to simply 5 use that top area and type in your citation using the 6 format that's indicated right below to use. 7 Next, down there by search by keyword or 8 phrase, which is what you are going to often use, you 9 can search across all the collections or limit your 10 search to one collection of cases. If you just want 11 Court of Appeals or you just want Supreme Court orders 12 or something, if you simply would type in your search 13 phrase. At the bottom there are some search tips, and 14 I also handed out a sheet that has search tips. 15 This is a service that's been developed on a 16 budget. We are not Lexus or West. It's not a, you 17 know, several million dollar search engine. It's a 18 good search engine, it's standard, but it's important 19 to read the instructions about how to do the searches, 20 you know, using your ands, your ors, and connectors. 21 If you follow those directions, you are going to get 22 excellent search results. 23 One features is that you can also do an 24 advanced opinion search, so in there, if you wanted 25 to simply look for things with a particular party

1 name, you can do that. If you want to find the 2 opinions of a particular, that are written by a 3 particular judge, you can do that. You have a docket 4 number, a specific citation, and then at the very end 5 you can limit the range of your search to a particular 6 year range of time, maybe you just want to see things 7 since the year 2000. You can do that. So I think the 8 advanced search gives you a lot of the functions that 9 you are used to in some of the high level research 10 services. 11 Now let's take a look at what the search 12 results are going to look like. There is term 13 highlighting. You can turn that off if you want, but 14 if you want term highlighting, if you put in, in this 15 case we put in the search term highway exception, you 16 will get the citations to the case with a little 17 snippet of the case surrounding the first area where 18 your term, the term that you searched for, appeared, 19 and then you are also getting the citation for the 20 case and an indication of whether it's a Supreme Court 21 or the Court of Appeals. This should help you quickly 22 look through the results and know whether this is 23 something you want to go to and look at further or if 24 it's not really what you are looking for. 25 Now let's see what an actual opinion looks

1 like. Here is how the opinions are going to be set 2 up. Again you see at the top the cobranding so that 3 your members are going to be seeing that this is 4 brought to you by the State Bar and ICLE. 5 We put all the key information right at the 6 top in terms of the name, the citation. There is a 7 link for full name in cases where there are multiple 8 defendants. The name that appears that's printed 9 there, is the one in the book, but often there is a 10 longer name to the case. You can click and you can 11 get that clearly, quickly you can see when it was 12 decided, the docket numbers, the disposition, whether 13 it was reversed or affirmed. You see the names of the 14 counsel and the judges. We really tried to set it up 15 so that just at a glance you had all the key 16 information that you needed. 17 And we also built in some sort of nifty 18 features. I think up at the top the underlined stuff 19 that's right below the blue bar, there is view 20 opinions. You can jump to the majority of concurring 21 or the dissent opinions. They are just quick ease of 22 access. There is print this case, and that's like a 23 print friendly version of the case, so if you want to 24 include it in your briefs or your motions, you can 25 just click that and it's going to automatically

1 download it and print it out for you on just blank 2 paper. You are not going to have any, see any of the 3 surrounding information. 4 Then one of the nicest features is view 5 Michigan decisions that cite this case, and that's up 6 at the top left there, and next slide. When you click 7 back, here is a list of all the other Michigan cases 8 in the state, so it would all be things going forward 9 from -- these cases only go back to '42, so everything 10 that's subsequently citing cases that are here that 11 are Michigan cases are going to show up on this list. 12 Now, what you are not going to get is if a 13 federal court has cited this case, that's not going to 14 be on the list, or an out-of-state case citing this, 15 but it's going to give you the Michigan history. 16 There is one other caveat, and that is in a 17 few cases a case goes back on remand and it changes 18 its docket number, and we haven't figured out how to 19 catch those. So that's not very often, but that is 20 not here, and we are going to work on that. If we can 21 figure out a way to tell the machine to find it, we 22 are going to find it, but right now that's not there. 23 Now, another feature is we have a feature 24 that says cite this case, and we have simply converted 25 all the citations to the official citation format with

1 parallel sites and so on, so it complies with the 2 court rule or court order that tells you what the 3 official citation needs to be in your briefs. 4 So you click on that, you get this, and you 5 just copy it and have it right there for your briefs 6 and opinions. 7 Then I also want to take a look at another 8 picture of a case that's just to show you that within 9 the case itself there is also term highlighting. Any 10 term that you searched for is going to be highlighted. 11 There is a limitation. If the case is 80 pages long, 12 the term highlighting dies. I mean it doesn't go past 13 80 pages, and that's just for reasons of speed if it 14 were doing that. 15 And then there is another feature right in 16 the middle of that page, Nancy, it says page 462 is 17 underlined. We are providing you in all these 18 opinions when you are citing the cases, you are going 19 to be able to get pinpoint cites. You are going to 20 know what the official page, is because everything 21 below that is on page 462 in the regular printed 22 opinion, and, again, that's underlined, and if you 23 clicked on that, you would see the official pinpoint 24 cite. Doesn't give you the pinpoint to Northwest, 25 just the first page of the Northwest cite, and that

1 complies with Court Rule. 2 So those are the features. We welcome your 3 feedback. This is a service that is being developed 4 by your State Bar and ICLE for you, for your members. 5 We don't have millions of dollars, but we do have a 6 lot of energy. We have staff who are excited, who are 7 dedicated, who are intelligent who are working on 8 this. 9 If you have ideas about content, additional 10 things that you would like to see, additional features 11 that you would like to see, ICLE and the State Bar are 12 sitting down and talking about reviewing this service 13 once a year where we will discuss, hey, are there 14 features that our members would really like to have, 15 we will consider the cost, we will consider the 16 interest in those and decide what to do, when to 17 enhance the service. 18 Problems and support. Over the next couple 19 of weeks I would ask for your patience. There is 20 going to be a tremendous amount of activity and phone 21 calls to us in the next couple of weeks about these 22 user names and passwords and just people getting 23 familiar with the service and learning the ropes and 24 how to search. So I won't be surprised -- we have 25 scheduled Monday, we have got 12 front line people on

1 the phones. We have alerted the whole staff that they 2 might be called upon to answer the phones, but we've 3 still got a limited number of lines coming in, and so 4 we are expecting a lot of activity as people get on 5 board, and I am sure, as with any software product, 6 there might be some wrinkles or glitches. Send us an 7 e-mail, we can fix it. I mean, there can be always 8 broken links and things or something get out of 9 kilter, but we will get the wrinkles ironed out. 10 I have used it in test periods. Our staff, 11 our legal staff had a week of doing rigorous testing 12 of it, testing their searches, comparing them to the 13 same search on Lexus and West Law. We feel real good 14 about the reliability of it, but you have to follow 15 the search rules. You do have to take the time to 16 look at those search tips, and we will keep -- again, 17 if things come up that we haven't thought of in terms 18 of explanations of how to do searches to get the best 19 results, we are expecting feedback from our users to 20 help us to improve those search tips. I mean, again, 21 the nice thing about the web is when we have new 22 information we can put it right into the search tips, 23 post those right away, and it will be available to 24 you. 25 So we are excited and if you have questions I

1 can field those if we have time. Thank you very much. 2 (Applause.) 3 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: Like I say, we have been 4 talking about making services available to members. 5 They have been working at it, and I think they have 6 succeeded more than admirably. 7 I want to bribe everybody by telling you a 8 little bit about lunch, but if you want to stretch in 9 place without leaving the room while I do so, this 10 would be a good time to just stand up and stretch your 11 legs. But I wanted to let you know that what we are 12 waiting for here is not a boxed lunch with a cold 13 sandwich and a little plastic thing full of cold slaw 14 as we are kind of accustomed to. You may have noticed 15 that the breakfast buffet did not have the fresh fruit 16 and some of the things that have been here in the 17 past. 18 What we decided to try, based upon input 19 after we had a hot lunch at the law school, was to cut 20 back on the breakfast and to put the money towards 21 lunch. So for lunch -- and we will find out, if 22 necessary, if we can grab it there and bring it here 23 or if we will indeed eat it there, but for lunch 24 today, wild mushroom bisque followed by two types of 25 salad, antipasto platter, penne pasta, chicken

1 parmesan vegetable lasagna, squash, two types of 2 bread, crispy Italian, and then that other Italian 3 with that long F word that I am afraid to pronounce in 4 public, jumbo cookies, fudge brownies, coffee and tea. 5 So hang on, hang in there. We are working 6 towards something that should be worthwhile, and I 7 would invite you each afterwards to give us feedback 8 as to whether you think for the future that was a good 9 decision to cut back here and add it to there and get 10 us something that we could really call a lunch or if 11 you've got some other idea, but we can't have a whole 12 lot of extra money, but we can move around the money 13 we do have. 14 With that, I would like to introduce, and I 15 think what I will do is I will have them, I will 16 introduce them both at once and have them take the 17 mike separately, Dustin Ordway and Vince Romano, two 18 of our members who have been asked to serve as 19 liaisons to sections who we have asked today to come 20 to us and briefly let us know what it is those 21 sections are up to. So if Dustin will take the 22 microphone first, either come up here or grab one on 23 the floor, whichever is more comfortable for you. Did 24 Dustin not make it today? I thought I saw him 25 earlier. Okay, Vince.

1 MR. ROMANO: Are we still morning? Good 2 morning, everyone. Nice to meet you. I have been 3 involved with the Law Practice Management Section for 4 about ten years now, a member of its counsel for that 5 length of time. I am the current vice chair. I guess 6 that puts me two heartbeats away from chair, and 7 section treasurer, so I have been involved with this 8 section for quite some time. I can tell you a bit 9 about what we do. 10 We typically market ourselves as being every 11 Michigan lawyers' other section. Just as you might 12 belong to one of the substantive sections to, you 13 know, reap that valuable expertise that your 14 colleagues can provide, so can we provide a lot of 15 valuable resources and materials to help make your 16 practice more efficient, more economical, more 17 economic and more profitable. 18 We do that by providing an awful lot of 19 resources and materials. Some of the resources 20 include regular programming at the annual meeting, and 21 that will frequently include both the expertise that 22 our counsel and our section can bring to the floor, 23 but also recognize national experts. We have had some 24 excellent programs at the annual meeting, and those 25 materials are still available. Most of it is still

1 current stuff and is available on the section site. 2 We also provide, we developed a seminar that 3 we have taken around the state called the Nuts and 4 Bolts of Successful Law Practice, and we have the 5 program materials and so forth. We have done that 6 particular presentation throughout southeast Michigan, 7 we have done it in Ingham County, Genesee County, 8 Grand Rapids, and, as I look about and see some 9 familiar faces from those presentations, let me 10 mention that any of you that are involved in your 11 local Bar associations and would be interested in 12 having that program, you can reach me online, 13 Vinceromano@aol.com. I would be happy to, you know, put 14 that kind of planning in motion. We will bring that 15 particular show to you. I am sure you would be happy 16 with it. 17 You have heard -- well, I was happy to see 18 Lynn here just before me. We are also a co-sponsor, 19 you have these programs, this announcement in front of 20 you regarding ICLE's new solo and small practice 21 institute. You will see we are co-sponsor of that in 22 providing some of the expertise. 23 As most of our sections, State Bar sections 24 do, the Law Practice Management Section publishes 25 quarterly newsletter addressing practice management

1 issues, and then I would be remiss if I didn't tell 2 you what really becomes our big piece every three 3 years. Every three years for the past 28 years, that 4 makes it one of the longest section activities, 5 longest lived section activities in the State Bar, we 6 have conducted a survey of the economics of law 7 practice in Michigan, and it's really the source for 8 information for planning, planning and reference tool 9 for those of you involved in the management of your 10 practice. 11 Basically the survey allows -- you will find 12 yourself and your circumstances in that survey 13 portrayed in such a way that you can compare those 14 circumstances to your colleagues in virtually any 15 setting. If it's an economic issue involving the 16 practice of law, it's covered in this survey. We 17 cover the demographics of the practice, income -- I am 18 just giving you the highlights. Each of these areas 19 is broken down -- income, billing rates, what people 20 are paying for staff, what people are paying 21 attorneys, associates, what they are earning, a 22 thorough picture of the economics of law practice. 23 You would have seen part of that in the 24 November issue of the Bar Journal which has several 25 articles resulting from the survey. You can now see

1 it in an excellent compilation that is for sale 2 through the State Bar. You know, you can go online 3 and find it. Again, it's an excellent resource tool. 4 We renew this survey every three years. 5 We are in the process of doing some of our 6 own strategic planning to better, let me say, 7 coordinate our section, you know, with what we need to 8 be and how we need to accomplish our goals and mission 9 relative to the reorganization of the State Bar and so 10 forth to keep ourselves, you know, relevant to that. 11 That strategic planning effort has involved John and 12 Tom Byerley. They were kind enough to join us for 13 most of a Saturday several months back. That process 14 continues. 15 So the Law Practice Management Section I am 16 very happy to report to you is very alive, very 17 healthy, we have a lot to offer to our colleagues. 18 You have my e-mail address if you perceive any way 19 that we can, you know, deliver those kinds of 20 services, facilitate that mission in your bailiwick, 21 give me a call. We would be happy to do that. 22 (Applause.) 23 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: I am going to have to look 24 later and see if I excused Dustin. I apologize for 25 pronouncing his name wrong. Nobody tell him.

1 Moving on to Assembly Committee reports. We 2 have several standing committees that serve the 3 Assembly. We have asked the chairs of several of 4 those committees to report to you what they have been 5 up to. Terri Stangl is here from Assembly Review, Tom 6 Rombach from Nominating, which he has already reported 7 on for the most part but wants to talk about awards, 8 and then Ed Haroutunian, Special Issues. So if Terri 9 would begin. 10 MS. STANGL: Good morning. On my way here I 11 heard about the astronomical event where all the 12 planets were aligning the next few days, you may have 13 read about that, and I felt like after hearing the 14 remarks from our earlier leaders that there is an 15 alignment, because what I am going to tell you about 16 the Representative Assembly fits in very nicely. 17 For those of you who don't know, the Assembly 18 Review Committee is charged with reviewing and making 19 recommendations about how to improve the operations of 20 this body to serve you and to help you serve the 21 circuits that you represent. 22 This morning I am going to tell you about 23 three topics that we are currently working on and then 24 also ask for your help so we can do our business 25 better.

1 The first topic that we are working on is 2 looking at how the Representative Assembly 3 communicates with you, how your leadership 4 communicates with you, and how you might want to 5 communicate with each other in between our meetings. 6 We are trying to find out what kinds of 7 information would be helpful for you to receive 8 between meetings and whether there is any kind of 9 dialogue or discussion that may be useful to have 10 before you actually get to these meetings. 11 So we are very curious about your thoughts 12 about what some of those needs may be, or you may say, 13 I already get enough information, please don't send me 14 more, and that would be useful to know as well. 15 Once we know what kinds of information you 16 would like, we are also looking at what would be the 17 best ways to provide it to you, whether that would be 18 through electronic means, bulletin boards, or some 19 other method, so we would like to hear about that. 20 And then once we have this information we 21 will be looking at the cost of meeting any needs that 22 seem to be there and coming back to you with any 23 recommendations. 24 The next topic we have been looking at is a 25 perennial one for the Assembly, and that's the

1 question of dealing with vacancies. As you know, 2 looking through our list, there are periodically 3 vacancies that we are trying to struggle with filling, 4 frequently, but not always, from the more remote 5 areas, and so the Review Committee is asking ourselves 6 are there things we could do to better recruit and 7 support and help people recognize how important it is 8 to be a part of the Assembly and support them so they 9 really might want to join. 10 So you all are here. It's like preaching to 11 the choir, but you may know what would help you be 12 here and stay here and what might recruit other 13 members in the Bar to join us. 14 There is a survey of a nice, bright pink 15 document that was in your packet this morning. We 16 would really welcome any thoughts, ideas you have. 17 There is a box with a bright pink sign on the back 18 where you can put it in, and if you want to think 19 about it and would like to submit something later -- I 20 hope you do it today, it's always easier to do it the 21 same day -- you could fax it in to Glenna or you can 22 send ideas to me by e-mail. 23 The third topic that we are going to be 24 working on in the committee is one variation on 25 vacancies, which is the question of what happens when

1 an Assembly member who was involved in the military or 2 national service is called up, and once in a while 3 this does happen. And increasingly in our current day 4 and age we don't know how long that's going to be. 5 They could be gone months or a year or more. 6 So the question is should that position be 7 left vacant, should that position be refilled in some 8 way, or should we consider some kind of an interim 9 appointment so the circuit could have representation? 10 And there is a work group of the committee looking at 11 this, and if you do have any thoughts on those, please 12 feel free to send it to me. 13 All the committee members are up on the 14 website with our names and e-mail. Also, my name is 15 on the back page for another item, on item 12, if you 16 want to pull it off from there. 17 So thank you very much for helping us, and we 18 hope to bring you back some thoughts based on your 19 ideas. 20 (Applause.) 21 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: I just wanted to thank 22 Matt Abel, who is responsible for making sure that we 23 didn't forget the communication issue and that people 24 are looking for a way to reach each other between 25 meetings and kept us from letting that slip away, so

1 thank you. 2 MR. ROMBACH: Two topics I would like to 3 cover today, the first being the vacancies, becomes 4 semi-redundant here with Dan's comments and Terri's as 5 well. 6 It's always an ongoing cause for concern and 7 certainly one of the unfulfilled items that I had left 8 over from my chairmanship. I think the fairest method 9 that we could come up with for filling the vacancies 10 in the Representative Assembly is by recruiting 11 candidates right this moment to run for positions in 12 the upcoming elections. That way we don't have to go 13 about nominating people that are friends and relatives 14 to fill the seats here. Again, I would like to 15 recruit friends and relatives, of course, to fill the 16 seats. 17 Our committee will contact all the 18 Representative Assembly members that are eligible for 19 reelection to determine their intentions, and then 20 would try to recruit the lawyers to fill the vacancies 21 here in April. In front of you, you have got a list, I 22 believe, of the members that are up for reelection. 23 As Dan said, also included is the petition. So if you 24 appear on this list, we expect you to fill out this 25 petition, and if you see vacancies in your particular

1 area, we would be particularly interested in hearing 2 from you. And also for the term limited members, for 3 instance I know the 31st circuit both of our members 4 are leaving the same year, and I would like to make 5 sure that you can replicate yourselves, because that's 6 always a particularly difficult mission when we don't 7 have any remaining members. 8 As you can see, sometimes it's in those areas 9 where we only have one member that we can't find that 10 person to replace a retiring member or somebody that's 11 term limited. So we would like to have you take 12 particular note of these opportunities. 13 If you have any discussions after reviewing 14 that list, please, by all means, contact me or another 15 member of the committee with these suggestions. 16 Certainly all of them are welcome. And if you have 17 some intentions as far as not rerunning for your seat, 18 please see me before you leave here today. Otherwise 19 we may be replacing you nonetheless, so we wouldn't 20 want to do that. 21 Secondly, the other item I want to touch 22 upon, and, again, this is going to be a bit redundant. 23 You may have in front of you a Michael Franck Award 24 and the Unsung Hero Award as far as a handout. There 25 is additionally those items replicated in the awards

1 and nominations booklet. 2 Now, these two items, and there is 3 applications in here, these two items are specific to 4 the Representative Assembly. We have given out the 5 Michael Franck Award for a number of years. It's been 6 very good at gaining attention for the Assembly and 7 also recognizing those members of our profession that 8 have made an outstanding contribution to its 9 improvement. 10 Last year, in fact, Wally Riley, our past 11 State Bar president and ABA president received the 12 award, along with Justice Marilyn Kelly for her 13 contributions to our profession as an Assembly member 14 and also through the appellate court system. 15 New this year, however, is the Unsung Hero 16 Award. In evaluating some of the applications in 17 years past we have come across the fact that there is 18 a lot of dignitaries that get nominated by a number of 19 different groups, but then there also seems to be 20 other lawyers that have been working diligently behind 21 the scenes, certainly been a credit to the profession 22 and that have really made an extraordinary commitment 23 to benefit others, both in our profession through 24 mentoring and also outside the profession, and since 25 they always seem to be overlooked by the big names

1 that get the Michael Franck Award, we felt this year 2 we would try to recognize these people in the trenches 3 that serve with us each and every day. 4 So, again, that's a new award. We have had 5 nominations in the past that we thought were 6 particularly meritorious but couldn't pigeonhole them 7 into something that we already had, so we created it. 8 So I would be particularly interested in any 9 nominations that the folks here may have with regards 10 to this role. 11 And, finally, I just want to recognize the 12 members of the committee that would be particularly 13 busy in this month to come, because we are going to 14 have to put all this together in fairly short order. 15 I would note, however, that the nominations for the 16 awards aren't due until July 26, but we would prefer 17 them to be in a little bit early, otherwise we start 18 making up the nominees ourselves on July 27th. 19 The Nominating Awards Committee consists of, 20 aside from myself, Shawn Davis from Muskegon, Tom 21 Evans from Hastings, Gary Giguere from Kalamazoo, 22 Dennis Grenkowicz, former commissioner from Alpena, 23 and Steven Taratuta from Detroit. So, again, please 24 buttonhole them as well if you have any ideas. 25 Thank you very much or your rapt attention.

1 (Applause.) 2 CHAIRPERSON LEVY: I would like to thank Tom 3 and note we are still working on the question of who 4 you name an award after if you are only going to give 5 it to people that nobody has ever heard of. 6 MR. HAROUTUNIAN: Thanks, Mr. Chairman. The 7 Special Issues Committee of the Representative 8 Assembly really, as Dan Levy indicated, deals with 9 some of the larger policy concerns, and, as Scott 10 Brinkmeyer mentioned, we also took a look at the 11 boring ABA meeting of this past August 2003, and we 12 also took a look at, in part, at the kind of general 13 comment of putting, as John Berry said, putting the 14 resources of the Bar and those things that affect the 15 Bar. 16 We are going to use a -- and the Special 17 Issues Committee has had a chance to meet on several 18 occasions, really by telephone conference. We have 19 had a chance to review some things, and let's, by 20 Power Point presentation, let's go through some of 21 those kinds of issues that we have talked about in our 22 analysis, and this is really in the form of a report. 23 We took a look at three kinds of items, the 24 ABA Justice in Jeopardy Report, which was a lengthy, 25 lengthy report out of the ABA that was adopted in

1 August of 2003, Michigan Senate Joint Resolution G, 2 and also issues concerning the Michigan delegates to 3 the ABA House of Delegates. 4 The Justice In Jeopardy Report, again, was 5 adopted in August of 2003, set forth certain 6 principles for judges and essentially concluded that 7 the judiciary and the other branches of government 8 should really interact effectively. There were two 9 primary recommendations coming out. One was to 10 preserve the judiciary's institutional legitimacy, and 11 the second was to improve judicial selection. 12 On those two recommendations, the first was 13 preserve the judiciary's institutional legitimacy, and 14 this was through qualification, training, and 15 evaluation with regard to those judges' ethics and 16 discipline, diversity in the bench, and court 17 community relations. 18 The second was improving judicial selection, 19 and this was based on the commission-based appointment 20 system, as well as there were other alternatives set 21 forth, but that was the primary thrust. 22 The analysis that the Special Issues 23 Committee went through with regard to that ABA report 24 really focused on the kinds of things that we here in 25 the Representative Assembly or at the Board of

1 Commission level have kind of already addressed, and 2 in April, on April 27 of 1996, the Representative 3 Assembly had adopted ten basic goals with regard to 4 the State Bar of Michigan's Long-Range Committee, and 5 they included efficiency of the justice system, 6 independence of the Bench and Bar, professionalism and 7 competence of the Bench and Bar, public understanding 8 of and respect for the justice system and the legal 9 profession. 10 The Representative Assembly also approved the 11 State Bar of Michigan's long-range plan on 12 September 12th, and at that particular -- at the 13 Representative Assembly meeting in 2001, September, 14 the Representative Assembly urged that the Michigan 15 Legislature, the Supreme Court, the State Bar, its 16 Board of Commissioners, the staff prioritize certain 17 programs that educate voters as to the workings of the 18 judicial system and the background, experience, 19 qualifications of the candidates, and in addition, and 20 this is kind of a point of contention with regard to 21 the ABA's position, the State Bar endorsed a system 22 for the election of judges in all Michigan state 23 courts which reduces to the greatest degree possible 24 the politics of the judicial selection process, and, as 25 I say, that particular point is contrary to the ABA

1 position. 2 In addition, on April 27 of 2002 the Rep 3 Assembly resolved that the governor should call upon 4 the State Bar to assist in screening candidates for 5 judicial appointments when vacancies occur and that no 6 judicial appointment should be made by the governor 7 unless the State Bar has received adequate time and 8 opportunity to really screen each of those candidates, 9 and the State Bar should dedicate sufficient resources 10 to continue its process of screening candidates for 11 judicial appointments in the manner that's fair and 12 timely. 13 The analysis of the Special Issues Committee 14 in this regard was that really no action was needed. 15 The ABA report, to be sure, is informative, but it is 16 not binding on State Bar associations, and, in addition, 17 the State Bar through the Representative Assembly has 18 really taken a good number of positions already on the 19 issues that have been presented. 20 We went on -- let's move on to the second 21 particular point, which was Senate Joint Resolution G. 22 This was presented in the Michigan Legislature in 23 February of this year. The proponent was Senator Mike 24 Switalski, democrat out of Roseville. He proposed 25 that a constitutional amendment be put forward where

1 the governor would appoint Supreme Court Justices for 2 a single 14-year term. The Senate must approve the 3 gubernatorial appointment by a two-thirds vote. 4 In the case of a vacancy due to an expired 5 term, the governor shall appoint a judicial nominee 60 6 days prior to the vacancy or within 60 days if the 7 vacancy is due to death, removal, or resignation. If 8 the governor fails to make that appointment within 9 that 60 days, then the Senate will make the 10 appointment by a two-thirds vote. 11 The analysis that the Special Issues 12 Committee wanted to bring to this was that, in fact, 13 the State Bar, again on September 13th, 2001, urged 14 the Michigan Legislature, the Supreme Court, et 15 cetera, et cetera, to really prioritize its programs 16 and to educate voters, and, in addition, that the 17 State Bar endorses a system for the election of judges 18 in all Michigan state courts. So to that extent the 19 State Bar of Michigan's policy is contrary to the 20 position being put forward. 21 Again, the Special Issues Committee felt that 22 no action was needed on this particular Resolution G, 23 one, because the State Bar has already taken a 24 position on the issue, and, secondly, Resolution G is 25 unlikely to succeed.

1 The history is that Senator Switalski has 2 unsuccessfully proposed the same resolution last year, 3 and, in addition, Senator Ken Sikkema, and in the 4 interest of full disclosure, Senator Sikkema is a 5 Republican, just to make sure I made that disclosure, 6 unsuccessfully proposed similar resolutions in 1999 7 and 2001. 8 To date there are no co-sponsors for this 9 Resolution G. It requires a two-thirds vote of both 10 houses to pass, and Resolution G has been referred to 11 the Senate Committee on Government Relations, and no 12 other activity has been anticipated nor to my 13 knowledge been scheduled. 14 Finally, it's pretty tough to amend the 15 constitution and at the same time take away people's 16 rights to vote, and so that's kind of where that 17 particular issue is. 18 The last issue was the issue of the Michigan 19 delegates of the ABA House of Delegates. The Michigan 20 ABA delegates are essentially the State Bar President, 21 State Bar Executive Director, a member from the Young 22 Lawyers Section, four lawyers appointed by the Board 23 of Commissioners, and then there are other folks who 24 come from affinity Bar associations. As an example, 25 the Greater Detroit Metropolitan Bar Association, the

1 Federal Bar Association, and others. But the ones 2 that we have placed asterisks by are the ones that 3 essentially represent the State Bar of Michigan. 4 There is a policy with regard to the ABA 5 delegates in terms of positions taken by the State Bar 6 and how that's to be interacted. In April of 1990 the 7 Board of Commissioners indicated that it was the 8 policy of the State Bar not to instruct its appointees 9 to the ABA House of Delegates as to how to vote, and 10 the committee felt that this was an issue that perhaps 11 between now and the next meeting of the Representative 12 Assembly, that this was something that we really ought 13 to perhaps take a look at and at least talk about in 14 terms of advising delegates to the ABA of the 15 relevant, existing State Bar of Michigan provisions, 16 resolutions. On the other hand, requiring a vote 17 consistent with the existing policy or require 18 accountability and reporting back of the ABA delegates 19 to come back to the Representative Assembly and report 20 in terms of what it is that's gone on and what kind of 21 votes occurred. 22 Again, these are not positions that we have 23 really taken at this time. These are positions that 24 we are going to talk about and hopefully come back to 25 you at the next meeting with recommendations with

1 regard to that. 2 Finally, I want to thank the committee 3 members who really have been very, very hel