State Bar of Michigan
home member area contact us


 print this page

for members
SBM general information

member directory

admissions, ethics, and

diversity & inclusion

justice initiatives

member services

practice management
   resource center

public policy resource

publications and

research and links

sections & committees

ethics for members
ethics developments
ethics opinions
TAON (trust accounts)

from the courts
opinion searching
virtual court

for the public
public resources
media resources

giving opportunities
a lawyer helps
access to justice

Ethics Opinion

print this page


July 9, 1984


    In the absence of any formal work relationship, the sharing office space between sole practitioners should not impair the independent professional judgment of either lawyer with regard to adverse clients where they do not work together or on each others cases; maintain strict confidentiality as to their own files; and/or do not represent such clients in the matters in which they are in fact adverse.

    References: MCPR Canon 5, DR 5-105.


Inquiring lawyer is a sole practitioner renting office space from landlord lawyer. Tenant pays costs of xeroxing, postage and secretarial time to Landlord, and has in the past has done some work for Landlord. Tenant has now been offered a contract to provide legal aid services in the area, for which Tenant will be working out of the grantee office 50 hours a month. Tenant asks whether the office arrangement with Landlord may continue when Landlord may represent parties opposing legal services clients.

MCPR Canon 5 provides that a lawyer should exercise independent professional judgment in behalf of a client. MCPR DR 5-105(A) provides:

    "A lawyer shall decline proffered employment if the exercise of his independent professional judgment in behalf of a client will be or is likely to be adversely affected by the acceptance of the proffered employment, except to the extent permitted under DR 5-105(C)."

Since Tenant has no other association with Landlord other than renting office space and secretarial services, Tenant's independent professional judgment with regard to legal services clients should not be impaired. If, however, Landlord were to seek the aid or consultation of Tenant in a case against a legal services client, it would be inappropriate for Tenant to associate herself with the case in any way. "A lawyer's fiduciary duty is of the highest order and he must not represent interests adverse to those of the client." Smoot v. Lund, 13 Utah 2d 168, 172, 369 P2d 933, 936 (1962). ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility EC 5-14 further provides that "maintaining the independence of professional judgment required of a lawyer precludes his acceptance or continuation of employment that will adversely affect his judgment on behalf of or dilute his loyalty to a client." However, in this situation, Tenant has already terminated her work relationship with Landlord and thus has alleviated any possible future client conflicts of interest.



follow us
Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on LinkedIn Follow Us on Twitter Follow the SBM Blog


©Copyright 2014

website links
Contact Us
Site Map
Website Privacy Statement PDF
Staff Links

SBM on the Mapcontact information
State Bar of Michigan
306 Townsend St
Lansing, MI 48933-2012
Phone: (517) 346-6300
Toll Free: (800) 968-1442
Fax: (517) 482-6248