State Bar of Michigan
home member area contact us


ethics



 print this page


for members
SBM general information

member directory

admissions, ethics, and
   regulation


diversity & inclusion

justice initiatives

member services

practice management
   resource center


public policy resource
   center


publications and
   advertising


research and links

sections & committees


ethics for members
ethics developments
ethics opinions
TAON (trust accounts)


from the courts
opinion searching
virtual court


for the public
public resources
media resources


giving opportunities
a lawyer helps
access to justice
   campaign

Ethics Opinion

print this page

CI-1100

July 18, 1985

SYLLABUS

    A lawyer-mediator may not later represent a client in the same case in which the lawyer served as mediator.

    References: MCPR DR 5-105; Op 95; CI-171, CI-966; MCR 2.403(D)(3) and (E).

TEXT

A lawyer served as plaintiff mediator on a three-lawyer mediation panel in circuit court. The mediators reviewed the plaintiff and defense summaries and heard counsel presentations; there were no individual conferences with counsel and no other sources of information about the case. Plaintiff's counsel in the subject litigation has now asked Plaintiff's mediator to become co-counsel in the case, and to handle the trial of the matter. The lawyer/mediator asks whether it is ethical to participate as counsel at trial of the matter mediated.

Although there are no previous ethical opinions dealing with mediators, it is clear that mediators serve in a quasi-judicial capacity. Cf., MCR 2.403(E), "The Rule for disqualification of a mediator is the same as that provided in MCR 2.003 for the disqualification of a judge." Thus rules regulating the disqualification of judges are applicable to mediators.

Most directly, the court rules limit a judge's role, once that individual has served as a mediator. MCR 2.403(D)(3) states:

    "A judge may be selected as a member of a mediation panel, but may not preside at the trial of any action in which he or she served as a mediator."

Certainly, the arguments raised by the instant inquirer apply equally to a judge, inasmuch as the trial judge participates in a manner more analogous to that of a mediator. The judge's previous knowledge of the case, just as the lawyer's comes only from the formal mediation processes.

Although the court rules do not address the specific question of whether judges, and thus, lawyer-mediators, may represent one of the parties to the litigation mediated, earlier ethics opinions proscribe such activity in other contexts.

Thus, a lawyer who is a justice of the peace cannot accept a retainer or represent any person in any case where that lawyer has previously acted in an official capacity [Op 95]. A lawyer who served as a special court commissioner in a condemnation proceeding may not represent an interested party in those proceedings in a subsequent civil action concerning the same subject matter [CI-171]. A lawyer who is a magistrate cannot represent any person in any case in which that lawyer previously acted in an official capacity [CI-966].

The rationale of these opinions permits extending them to lawyer-mediators. The action of a mediator is not merely mechanical, but requires the exercise of certain discretion. Because the mediator acts in a quasi-judicial capacity, the mediator in effect represents the people. Thus, when a lawyer is at the same time a mediator, a conflict of interest is apt to arise between duty toward the public and toward some client. While a lawyer may represent conflicting interests, after receivable express consent of the parties given after full disclosure of the facts, MCPR DR 5-105, this exception does not apply in any case where the lawyer occupies a public office. "Public Consent cannot be obtained and can never be presumed." Opinion 95.

Thus, a lawyer-mediator may not later represent a client in the same case in which the lawyer served as a mediator.

 
     

 

follow us
Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on LinkedIn Follow Us on Twitter Follow the SBM Blog

 

©Copyright 2014

website links
Contact Us
Site Map
Website Privacy Statement PDF
Staff Links

SBM on the Mapcontact information
State Bar of Michigan
306 Townsend St
Lansing, MI 48933-2012
Phone: (517) 346-6300
Toll Free: (800) 968-1442
Fax: (517) 482-6248