State Bar of Michigan
home member area contact us


ethics



 print this page


for members
SBM general information

member directory

admissions, ethics, and
   regulation


diversity & inclusion

justice initiatives

member services

practice management
   resource center


public policy resource
   center


publications and
   advertising


research and links

sections & committees


ethics for members
ethics developments
ethics opinions
TAON (trust accounts)


from the courts
opinion searching
virtual court


for the public
public resources
media resources


giving opportunities
a lawyer helps
access to justice
   campaign

Ethics Opinion

print this page

CI-765

July 21, 1982

SYLLABUS

    Unless the former client consents, a lawyer may not accept proffered employment if the lawyer would or could be placed in the position of litigating against a former client or using the confidences gained in representing the former client against the client.

    References: MCPR DR 5-105; CI-2, CI-276, CI-341, CI-379, CI-397, CI-411, CI-431, CI-479.

TEXT

A lawyer represented a married couple in the drafting of wills and a trust agreement. All consultations were joint, and no separate consultations were held by the lawyer with either spouse. The lawyer also gave the couple advice relating to a acquisition of a partnership interest in a real estate investment venture. The couple is now divorcing, and one party has sought the lawyer's services. The partnership agreement was a possibly still is a joint marital asset.

MCPR DR-105 provides:

    "(A) A lawyer shall decline proffered employment if the exercise of independent professional judgment in behalf of a client will be or is likely to be adversely affected by the acceptance of the proffered employment, except to the extent permitted under DR 5-105(C).

    "(B) A lawyer shall not continue multiple employment if the exercise of independent professional judgment in behalf of a client will be or is likely to be adversely affected by representation of another client, except to the extent permitted under DR 5-105(C)

    "(C) In the situations covered by DR 5-105 (A) and (B), a lawyer may represent multiple clients if it is obvious that the interests of each will be adequately represented and if each consents to the representation after full disclosure of the possible effect of such representation on the exercise of independent professional judgment on behalf of each.

    "(D) If a lawyer is required to decline employment or to withdraw from employment under DR 5-105, no partner or associate of the lawyers or of the firm may accept or continue such employment."

This precise inquiry has been ruled on numerous previous occasions. See e.g., CI-431, CI-411, CI-379, CI-341, CI-276, CI-2, CI-397 and CI-479.

The single most prevalent characteristic shown in these referenced opinions is that if a lawyer seeks to appropriately avoid the apparent potential conflict of interest representation problems and concerns, notice, full disclosure and consent must be made to and acknowledged by the former client. Grievance Comm. v. Rattner, 152 Conn 59, 65; 203 A2d 82 (1964), a firm may not accept any action against a person whom they are presently representing even though there is no relationship between the two cases.

In view of the fact that the clients have not consented, the representation would be improper. The lawyer would be placed in the awkward position of litigating against a former client, while possibly using the confidences of a former client against the client. In accord, CI-379.

 
     

 

follow us
Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on LinkedIn Follow Us on Twitter Follow the SBM Blog

 

©Copyright 2014

website links
Contact Us
Site Map
Website Privacy Statement PDF
Staff Links

SBM on the Mapcontact information
State Bar of Michigan
306 Townsend St
Lansing, MI 48933-2012
Phone: (517) 346-6300
Toll Free: (800) 968-1442
Fax: (517) 482-6248