State Bar of Michigan
home member area contact us


 print this page

for members
SBM general information

member directory

admissions, ethics, and

diversity & inclusion

justice initiatives

member services

practice management
   resource center

public policy resource

publications and

research and links

sections & committees

ethics for members
ethics developments
ethics opinions
TAON (trust accounts)

from the courts
opinion searching
virtual court

for the public
public resources
media resources

giving opportunities
a lawyer helps
access to justice

Ethics Opinion

print this page


May 21, 1983


    It is not unethical for a retired judge to use stationery with the letterhead designation "Attorney-at-Law" and the words "Formerly Judge of XXX Court" imprinted at the bottom of the stationery under circumstances where the individual is also retired from the practice of law, provided that the former judge maintains membership in the State Bar of Michigan, and the stationery is used for personal non-business correspondence to friends and acquaintances.

    References: Supreme Court Administrative Order 1978-4.


A retired judge who is no longer engaged in the practice of law proposes to indicate his previous judicial positions on stationery intended for personal use. The stationery would bear the words "Attorney-at-Law" imprinted on the masthead with the following, or similar designation, printed at the bottom of the stationery:

    "Formerly Circuit Judge-XXX County and Formerly Judge of the Michigan Court of Appeals."

Michigan Supreme Court Administrative Order 1978-4 is the rule governing lawyer communications and states:

    "A lawyer may on behalf of himself, his partner or associate, or any other lawyer affiliated with him or his firm, use or participate in the use of any form of public communication that is not false, fraudulent, misleading, or deceptive."

If the inquirer continues to maintain membership in the State Bar of Michigan, it would not be unethical for the inquirer to use the designation "Attorney at Law" imprinted. Similarly, the stationery may reveal the inquirer's former judicial positions, so long as the "retired" status is clearly indicated. If the inquirer were actively engaged in the practice, use of the proposed stationery would be improper, since there is an implication that because of the prior judicial positions, the inquirer may be in a position to influence former judicial colleagues to act favorably with regard to a client's matter.

On the subject of a letterhead designation "Attorney at Law," with the words "Formerly Circuit Judge-XXX County and Formerly Judge of Michigan Court of Appeals" printed at the bottom of the stationery, there appears to be nothing false, fraudulent, misleading, or deceptive, provided that the stationery is used for purely personal, non-business correspondence to friends and acquaintances.

The inquirer intends to use the stationery in part to shepherd "investments in stocks, bonds and land contracts." In this respect, there is a potential for use of the stationery in what may appear to be a legal situation and likely may be misleading to the recipients. The stationery should not be used for personal business matters.



follow us
Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on LinkedIn Follow Us on Twitter Follow the SBM Blog


©Copyright 2015

website links
Contact Us
Site Map
Website Privacy Statement PDF
Staff Links

SBM on the Mapcontact information
State Bar of Michigan
306 Townsend St
Lansing, MI 48933-2012
Phone: (517) 346-6300
Toll Free: (800) 968-1442
Fax: (517) 482-6248