State Bar of Michigan
home member area contact us


ethics



 print this page


for members
SBM general information

member directory

admissions, ethics, and
   regulation


diversity & inclusion

justice initiatives

member services

practice management
   resource center


public policy resource
   center


publications and
   advertising


research and links

sections & committees


ethics for members
ethics developments
ethics opinions
TAON (trust accounts)


from the courts
opinion searching
virtual court


for the public
public resources
media resources


giving opportunities
a lawyer helps
access to justice
   campaign

Ethics Opinion

print this page

CI-887

March 18, 1983

SYLLABUS

    It is improper for an assistant prosecuting attorney employed in one county to represent respondents charged in criminal cases in other counties of this state.

    References: MCPR DR 8-101; Op 193.

TEXT

An assistant county prosecutor wishes to defend a sibling on a criminal charge of littering being prosecuted in the district court by the county prosecutor's office.

Op 193 concluded that it is improper for a prosecuting attorney of one county to represent defendants in criminal cases in other counties of this state. A lawyer holding public office to simultaneously engage in the private practice of law, however, MCPR DR 8-101 admonishes the public official not to use the public position to obtain, or attempt to obtain, a special advantage on behalf of a client or otherwise use his or her public position to influence, or attempt to influence, an adjudicatory body to act favorably on behalf of a client.

The Prosecutor's Office has discretion to bring formal criminal charges against an individual and further, has the power to withdraw those charges. The primary duty of a prosecutor is to represent the interests of the public which necessarily involves the cooperation and assistance of prosecuting authorities in counties throughout the state. If a prosecutor in one county could serve as defense counsel in another county, it is likely that a dismissal of the charge may be regarded as a form of professional courtesy contrary to the best interests of the public and the proper enforcement of criminal jurisprudence.

 
     

 

follow us
Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on LinkedIn Follow Us on Twitter Follow the SBM Blog

 

©Copyright 2014

website links
Contact Us
Site Map
Website Privacy Statement PDF
Staff Links

SBM on the Mapcontact information
State Bar of Michigan
306 Townsend St
Lansing, MI 48933-2012
Phone: (517) 346-6300
Toll Free: (800) 968-1442
Fax: (517) 482-6248