State Bar of Michigan
home member area contact us


ethics



 print this page


for members
SBM general information

member directory

admissions, ethics, and
   regulation


diversity & inclusion

justice initiatives

member services

practice management
   resource center


public policy resource
   center


publications and
   advertising


research and links

sections & committees


ethics for members
ethics developments
ethics opinions
TAON (trust accounts)


from the courts
opinion searching
virtual court


for the public
public resources
media resources


giving opportunities
a lawyer helps
access to justice
   campaign

Ethics Opinion

print this page

NOTE: Various references in this ethics opinion to portions of the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct are no longer accurate due to amendments effective August 1, 2013. Click here to review language added to (which is underlined) and language stricken from (which is indicated by strikethrough) Canons 2, 4, 5, and 7.

JI-110

November 15, 1996

SYLLABUS

    A judge may serve as "track steward" at an automobile race provided that the judge is not classified as an employee of the race track, race sponsor, race sanctioning body or other organization involved in holding the activity.

    References: MCJC 5A, 5C(2), 6.

TEXT

A judge inquires whether the judge may serve as a "track steward" for automobile racing events sponsored by a national automobile race sanctioning body. The judge would be compensated for services as well as expenses, and there would be no publication or visible indication that the worker is in fact a judge.

MCJC 5A states:

    "A. Avocational Activities: A judge may write, lecture, teach, speak and consult on nonlegal subjects, appear before public nonlegal bodies, and engage in the arts, sports, and other social and recreational activities, if such avocational activities do not detract from the dignity of the office or interfere with the performance of the office or interfere with the performance of judicial duties." Emphasis added.

The Committee sees no adverse ethical implications from a judge's participation in an auto racing activity, provided that the particular activity does not detract from the dignity of the office.

One area of concern arises because the judge will be compensated for time and expenses. Generally, ethics rules do not prohibit receipt of income from sources other than the judge's salary. See MCJC 5C and 6. However, MCJC 5C(2) prohibits a judge from serving as a director, officer, manager, advisor, or employee of any business. Therefore, if the judge, by serving as track steward, is classified as an employee of the particular sponsoring or sanctioning organization, the judge could not serve. The determination of the track steward's status is not within the scope of the Committee's authority, and the inquirer is urged to seek clarification on this point.

Therefore, a judge may serve as a track steward at an automobile race provided that the judge does not become an employee of the sponsoring, sanctioning, or other organization involved in putting on the specified activity. Any compensation received from such activity would have to be reported pursuant to MCJC 6.

 
     

 

follow us
Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on LinkedIn Follow Us on Twitter Follow the SBM Blog

 

©Copyright 2014

website links
Contact Us
Site Map
Website Privacy Statement PDF
Staff Links

SBM on the Mapcontact information
State Bar of Michigan
306 Townsend St
Lansing, MI 48933-2012
Phone: (517) 346-6300
Toll Free: (800) 968-1442
Fax: (517) 482-6248