State Bar of Michigan
State Bar of Michigan
home
member area
contact us



michigan legal milestones

milestone home

map

plaque texts

resources

timeline

Legal Milestone List

Milliken v. Bradley
Elk, Oil, and Environment
Whisper to Rallying Cry
Eminent Domain
Prentiss M. Brown
Otis Milton Smith
Freedom Road
President Gerald R. Ford
Mary Coleman
Committee of One
Milo Radulovich
Striking Racial Covenants
Murphy's Dissent
Conveying Michigan
Ending Jim Crow
Pond's Defense
Mount Clemens Pottery
Emelia Schaub
Rose of Aberlone
Protecting the Impaired
Laughing Whitefish
The Uninvited Ear
The King's Grant
Improving Justice
One Person, One Vote
Eva Belles' Vote
Constitutional Convention
Ten Hours or No Sawdust
Access to Public Water
Augustus Woodward
Sojourner Truth
Justice William Fletcher
Roosevelt-Newett Trial
Cooley Law Office
Baseball Reserve Clause
Ossian Sweet Trial


36. Milliken v. Bradley—Desegregation,
Busing, and Boundaries

Milliken v. Bradley, a historic 1974 United States Supreme Court case that addressed a plan for desegregation of schools and busing in Detroit and its suburbs, is the subject of the State Bar’s 36th Michigan Legal Milestone.

Michigan Bar Journal

Michigan Bar Journal Cover

Milliken v Bradley: The Northern Battle for Desegregation PDF
September 2011

Resources

News Articles About Plaque Dedication

State Bar of Michigan Press Release

Photos from Plaque Dedication

Complete Text on Milestone Marker

    Milliken v. Bradley—
    Desegregation, Busing, and Boundaries

    School desegregation became the law of the land after the United States Supreme Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v Board of Education. Twenty years later, the Supreme Court issued another landmark decision in a Detroit-based busing case, Milliken v Bradley, which greatly impacted the city’s population and changed the course of school desegregation in the United States.

    In 1970, the Michigan legislature approved a bill to decentralize the Detroit school system. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, alleging public officials had intentionally segregated the Detroit schools, filed a lawsuit to overturn the statute on behalf of Richard and Ronald Bradley.

    Federal District Judge Stephen Roth ruled integration was not possible within the city’s boundaries and ordered a new plan to include 53 of the 85 surrounding, mostly white, school districts. This metropolitan plan set off a series of tense protests, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld Roth’s ruling.

    The United States Supreme Court heard the case in 1974. In a controversial 5-4 vote, it overturned the lower courts and ruled that federal courts, “could not impose a multidistrict, area-wide remedy upon local districts in the absence of any evidence those districts committed acts causing racial discrimination.” The judgment recognized the tradition of local control over schools and found the remedy approved by lower courts could alter the structure of public education in Michigan. The decision was a setback for forced desegregation, and it limited the scope of Brown that declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional.

    The Supreme Court ruling helped hasten Detroit’s racial divide. By the mid 1970s, Detroit schools had lost more than 51,000 white students. After the 2000 U.S. Census, the Detroit area received the dubious distinction of becoming “America’s Most Segregated City.”

    Placed by the State Bar of Michigan and the Wolverine Bar Association
    September 16, 2011