State Bar of Michigan
State Bar of Michigan
home
member login
contact us



public policy
resource center




 print this page


SBM general information

member directory

admissions, ethics, and
   regulation


justice initiatives

opinions, research, and
   links


practice management
   resource center


programs and services

public policy resource
   center


publications and
   advertising


sections


for the public
public resources
media resources


State Bar Positions: Rule Amendments and Administrative Orders
Rule Amendments | Administrative OrdersProposed Rule Amendments | Other
Rule Amendments (in order of effective date)

Amendments Effective January 1, 2007

Amendments Effective September 1, 2007

Administrative Orders


    Administrative Order No. 2003-6 - File No. 2002-34
    Case Management at the Court of Appeals
    POSITION: Concerning the amendments relating to intake proceedings only, the Board of Commissioners voted to:

      Support generally the ongoing efforts of the Court of Appeals to reduce appellate delay.
    • Support funding for appellate delay reduction initiatives to reduce the "warehouse."
    • Oppose the published revisions to MCR 7.212 that eliminate stipulated extensions of time to file briefs and shorten the time for filing briefs and reply briefs.
    • Recommend further study and urge attention to the recommendations of the Report of the State Bar of Michigan Task Force on Appellate Delay Reduction.

    Administrative Order No. 2002-5 - File No. 2002-44
    Differentiated Case Scheduling At the Court of Appeals
    POSITION: The Board of Commissioners voted to adopt the recommendation of the Civil Procedure & Courts Committee to support a pilot program of differentiated case management in the Court of Appeals and to defer endorsement of permanent differentiated case management scheduling until after publication of details about how such a program would be implemented and what effect the program is expected to have on the disposition of cases.


Proposed Rule Amendments

2007-30 - Proposed Amendment of Rules 2.107 and 2.117 of the Michigan Court Rules
Civil Procedure & Courts Committee POSITION: View Position PDF

2007-31 - Proposed Amendment of Rule 4.201 of the Michigan Court Rules
SBM POSITION: View Position PDF
Civil Procedure & Courts Committee POSITION:
View Position PDF

2007-28 - Proposed Amendment of Rule 3.901 of the Michigan Court Rules
Proposed Adoption of New Rule 3.930 of the Michigan Court Rules

SBM POSITION: View Position PDF

2007-24 - Proposed Amendment of Rules 2.301, 2.302, 2.401 and 2.506 of the Michigan Court Rules
SBM POSITION: View Position PDF

2006-32 - Proposed Amendment of Rule 2.504 of the Michigan Court Rules
SBM POSITION: View Position PDF
Civil Procedure & Courts Committee POSITION: View Position PDF
Justice Initiatives Committee POSITION: View Position PDF

2006-11 - Proposed Amendment of Rules 2.614, 7.101, 7.209, and 7.302 of the Michigan Court Rules
SBM POSITION: View Position PDF
Civil Procedure & Courts Committee POSITION: View Position PDF
Public Corporation Section POSITION: View Position PDF

2006-09 - Proposed Amendment of Rule 7.202 of the Michigan Court Rules
SBM POSITION: View Position PDF

2006-16 - Proposed Amendment of Rules 6.302 and 6.310 of the Michigan Court Rules
SBM POSITION: View Position PDF

2007-38 - Proposed Amendment of Rule 6.201 of the Michigan Court Rules
SBM POSITION: View Position PDF
Criminal Jurisprudence & Practice Committee POSITION: View Position PDF

2007-36 - Proposed Amendment of 9.208 of the Michigan Court Rules
Judicial Tenure Commission Proceedings Evidence Exchange

2005-25 - Proposed Amendment of Rule 2.203 of the Michigan Court Rules
Compulsory Joinder Provisions

2007-09 - Proposed Amendment of 2.306 of the Michigan Court Rules
To require objections at depositions to be concise, nonargumentative, and nonsuggestive and to allow for the imposition of sanctions
SBM POSITION: View Position PDF
Family Law POSITION: View Position PDF

2006-06 – Proposed Amendment of Rule 7.215 of the Michigan Court Rules
Resolution of Conflicts in Court of Appeals Decisions
Family Law POSITION: Support View Position PDF
SBM Position PDF
Civil Procedure & Courts Committee POSITION: View Position PDF

Other Actions


    The Court of Appeals ruling in Apsey v. Memorial Hospital has been appealed to the Michigan Supreme Court by the defendant. The State Bar of Michigan supports the filing of an amicus brief with the Michigan Supreme Court consistent with the amicus brief filed by the State Bar in the Court of Appeals.

    *Please note: If you do not currently have Adobe Acrobat on your computer, you may download it free by clicking the icon below.