Button to Return to the Main Demographics Page

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation Section Demographic Report, 2024

Tables of contents

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Members by Michigan Residency, 2024

Residency Count Percent
Michigan Resident 209 93.7%
Non-MI Resident 14 6.3%
Total 223 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Members by US Residency, 2024

Residency Count Percent
US Resident 222 99.6%
Non-US Resident 1 0.4%
Total 223 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Michigan Residents by Gender, 2024

Gender excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer. The 'other' category was added in 2022 and was not reported for previous years.

Gender Count Percent
Male 135 66.5%
Female 68 33.5%
Other 0 0.0%
Total 203 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Michigan Residents by Generation, 2024

Generation Count Percent
Traditionalists (pre-1944) 1 0.5%
Boomers (1944—1960) 35 16.7%
Gen X (1961—1980) 82 39.2%
Millennials (1981—1996) 83 39.7%
Gen Z (1997 and later) 8 3.8%
Total 209 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Michigan Residents by Race or Ethnicity, 2024

Race or ethnicity excludes No Answer and Prefer Not to Answer.

Race or Ethnicity Count Percent
American Indian 0 0.0%
Asian-Pacific Islander 4 3.0%
African Origin 5 3.8%
European 97 72.9%
Hispanic/Latino 1 0.8%
Multi-Racial 3 2.3%
Arab Origin 6 4.5%
Other Ethnic Origin 17 12.8%
Total 133 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Michigan Residents by Law School, 2024

Law School Count Percent
Ave Maria School of Law 0 0.0%
Michigan State University/DCL College of Law 34 16.3%
University of Detroit Mercy School of Law 24 11.5%
University of Michigan Law School 36 17.2%
Wayne State University Law School 43 20.6%
Western Michigan University Thomas Cooley Law School 22 10.5%
Other Law School 50 23.9%
Total 209 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Michigan Residents by Occupational Area, 2024

Practice Category Count Percent
Academia 0 0.0%
Corporate Counsel 61 29.2%
Government 6 2.9%
Government Relations 0 0.0%
Judiciary 1 0.5%
Law School 0 0.0%
Legal Services 6 2.9%
Military 0 0.0%
Non-Law Related 4 1.9%
Nonprofit Organization 1 0.5%
Not Employed: Not Seeking Employment 1 0.5%
Not Employed: Seeking Employment 2 1.0%
Other 3 1.4%
Private Practice 106 50.7%
Retired 2 1.0%
Not Reported 16 7.7%
Total 209 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Michigan Residents in Private Practice Firm Size, 2024

Firm Size N Percent
Very Large 100+ 38 35.8%
Large 21—99 27 25.5%
Medium 11—20 8 7.5%
Small 2—10 20 18.9%
Solo Full-Time 10 9.4%
Solo Part-Time 3 2.8%
Not Reported 0 0.0%
Total 106 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Michigan Residents by County, 2024

County Count Percent
Alcona 0 0.0%
Alger 0 0.0%
Allegan 2 1.0%
Alpena 0 0.0%
Antrim 0 0.0%
Arenac 0 0.0%
Baraga 0 0.0%
Barry 0 0.0%
Bay 0 0.0%
Benzie 0 0.0%
Berrien 1 0.5%
Branch 0 0.0%
Calhoun 1 0.5%
Cass 0 0.0%
Charlevoix 0 0.0%
Cheboygan 0 0.0%
Chippewa 0 0.0%
Clare 0 0.0%
Clinton 2 1.0%
Crawford 0 0.0%
Delta 0 0.0%
Dickinson 0 0.0%
Eaton 0 0.0%
Emmet 0 0.0%
Genesee 1 0.5%
Gladwin 0 0.0%
Gogebic 0 0.0%
Grand Traverse 0 0.0%
Gratiot 0 0.0%
Hillsdale 0 0.0%
Houghton 0 0.0%
Huron 0 0.0%
Ingham 10 4.8%
Ionia 0 0.0%
Iosco 0 0.0%
Iron 0 0.0%
Isabella 0 0.0%
Jackson 1 0.5%
Kalamazoo 2 1.0%
Kalkaska 0 0.0%
Kent 14 6.7%
Keweenaw 0 0.0%
Lake 0 0.0%
Lapeer 1 0.5%
Leelanau 0 0.0%
Lenawee 0 0.0%
Livingston 2 1.0%
Luce 0 0.0%
Mackinac 0 0.0%
Macomb 5 2.4%
Manistee 0 0.0%
Marquette 0 0.0%
Mason 0 0.0%
Mecosta 0 0.0%
Menominee 0 0.0%
Midland 2 1.0%
Missaukee 0 0.0%
Monroe 1 0.5%
Montcalm 0 0.0%
Montmorency 0 0.0%
Muskegon 1 0.5%
Newaygo 0 0.0%
Oakland 82 39.2%
Oceana 0 0.0%
Ogemaw 0 0.0%
Ontonagon 0 0.0%
Osceola 0 0.0%
Oscoda 0 0.0%
Otsego 0 0.0%
Ottawa 1 0.5%
Presque Isle 0 0.0%
Roscommon 0 0.0%
Saginaw 1 0.5%
Saint Clair 0 0.0%
Saint Joseph 0 0.0%
Sanilac 0 0.0%
Schoolcraft 0 0.0%
Shiawassee 0 0.0%
Tuscola 1 0.5%
Van Buren 0 0.0%
Washtenaw 21 10.1%
Wayne 47 22.5%
Wexford 0 0.0%
Total 209 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, Active Members Residing in Other States or Jurisdictions, 2024

State or Jurisdiction N Percent
California 1 7.1%
District of Columbia 4 28.6%
Florida 2 14.3%
Illinois 1 7.1%
Kentucky 1 7.1%
Ohio 1 7.1%
Ontario Canada 1 7.1%
South Carolina 1 7.1%
Texas 1 7.1%
Washington 1 7.1%
Total 14 100.0%

Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation, All Active Members by Section Membership, 2024

Section Number Percent
Administrative & Regulatory Law 39 17.5%
Agricultural Law 10 4.5%
Alternative Dispute Resolution 18 8.1%
American Indian Law 7 3.1%
Animal Law 11 4.9%
Antitrust, Franchising & Trade Regulation 223 100.0%
Appellate Practice 29 13.0%
Arts, Comm., Entertainment & Sports 27 12.1%
Aviation Law 9 4.0%
Business Law 122 54.7%
Cannabis Law 20 9.0%
Children’s Law 4 1.8%
Consumer Law 34 15.2%
Criminal Law 19 8.5%
Elder Law & Disability Rights 9 4.0%
Environmental Law 25 11.2%
Family Law 12 5.4%
Government Law 20 9.0%
Health Care Law 28 12.6%
Immigration Law 6 2.7%
Information Technology Law 39 17.5%
Insurance and Indemnity Law 22 9.9%
Intellectual Property Law 43 19.3%
International Law 34 15.2%
Labor & Employment Law 43 19.3%
Law Practice Management & Legal Admin 12 5.4%
LGBTQ+ Law 7 3.1%
Litigation 60 26.9%
Military and Veterans’ Law 5 2.2%
Negligence Law 17 7.6%
Paralegal/Legal Assistant 1 0.4%
Prisons & Corrections 8 3.6%
Probate & Estate Planning 24 10.8%
Real Property Law 51 22.9%
Religious Liberty Law 9 4.0%
Senior Lawyers 2 0.9%
Social Security Lawyers 0 0.0%
Solo & Small Firm 15 6.7%
Taxation 20 9.0%
Workers’ Compensation Law 6 2.7%
Young Lawyers 66 29.6%
Member Area SBM Connect
About SBM
What We Do
Members Only
Stay Connected
© Copyright 2021 SBM. All rights reserved.