Shackling; Ineffective assistance of counsel; Remand for an evidentiary hearing

In an order in lieu of granting leave to appeal, the court vacated the Court of Appeals judgment (see e-Journal # 75085 in the 4/8/21 edition) and remanded the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing as to whether (1) the trial court properly considered defendant’s request to remove his “shackles at trial; (2) the physical restraints were visible to any jurors; and (3) the defendant’s trial counsel rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to object to the admission of the entire body camera video, failing to make an effective challenge to a juror who had previously experienced domestic violence, and failing to make a closing argument.”