Termination under § 19b(3)(g); Children’s best interests

Holding that the trial court did not err by terminating both respondents’ parental rights to their five children, and that termination was in their best interests, the court affirmed. It concluded that “with suitable housing still an issue and both respondents failing to comply with their respective treatment plans, the trial court did not clearly err by finding that termination of their parental rights was supported by” § (g).